Watching The Watchers!
Caleigh Brooks
CALEIGHBROOKSWATCHINGTHEWATCHERS.COM

Sinners

Screeeeeech!!!  ALERT!  Please see sidebar --> --> -->



* t h e   V i d e o

T H E    B E S T    K E P T   S E C R E T
is always about sex!

Being a minority

~ the underdog ~


is

serious business!

It's no joke!


Have we got a treat for you! We're gonna' take you back in time - not too far back! Tell your friends! It'll be fun! (At the end of this entry, please see: Notes #1)

"Sinners" * the Video will take you back to the 1960s in the United States and all over the world wherever the pope and his cronies ruled with a mighty fist! They were misogynists of the highest order! During the 1960s - and the decades before and after the 60s - millions of single moms in the United States lost infants to adoption - the ONLY REASON these single moms lost their newborn infants is because they were UNMARRIED - fallen women! The exact number is illusive but statisticians have concluded that as high as 6 million to 8 million American children were lost in the 20th century to what investigators and researchers term as an experiment! You won't believe it! It's all true! We implore you - please read the WHOLE long post below! And see the WHOLE * Video by clicking on the following link:


To our Loyal Readers:    W E    A P P R E C I A T E    Y O U ! ! !
* DON'T FORGET! 
  1. 1st click on "Google" at the bottom right side of the video screen
  2. then click on "Full Screen" to get the full effect of the film!
~  If the above link to "Sinners" doesn't work for you:
  1. On the Internet, please go to Google Videos
  2. Key in Sinners.avi
~  If you are unable to view * the Video - please let us know in a comment and we will attempt to correct any problems. Thanks for your patience!

To our Loyal Subscribers:

If * the Video does not work properly from your email after clicking on the link for "Sinners," please view it by going directly to:
  1. Google Videos on the Internet
  2. Key in Sinners.avi
  3. Or go directly to:  http://caleighbrookswatchingthewatchers.com

  • T H A N K   Y O U ! ! !  for allowing us to share our thoughts with you today! We are humbled!
  • We know our readers are busy people; hence, we apologize for the length of some of the posts in this blogcast but - well, we want you to see "the whole picture." Please read our commentary in several sittings at your leisure, if it suits you best.   W E   N E E D   Y O U ! ! !  to be informed. Please come back often!
  • TOPICS AT A GLANCE at the end of this post is a summary of the subject matter of this post for your convenience. Hope it's helpful!
  • A single pregnant mom in * the Video is shown SMOKING a cigarette. In the 1960s, it wasn't known yet that smoking is bad for one's health. Puffing on cigarettes was fashionable then. Smoking is yet another product of our idiotic patriarchal past!
  • We view the following clarification so important that we have addressed it here in the beginning of this commentary: When we use the terms, ADOPTION INDUSTRY, or ADOPTION TITANS, in this blogcast, we include infertile couples (since they are the demand in the adoption industry), prospective adoptive parents, adoptive parents, and adoptive relatives, adoption agencies, adoption attorneys, adoption workers, social workers... EVERYONE and ANYONE who conspires to take possession of children that don't belong to them!
  • Mindbogglingly, so-called mental health professionals today are still not at all educated about the institution of adoption! They just casually think adoption is a great way to create a family for those who are unable to procreate - like going to the supermarket! By way of this commentary and * the Video, we hope to dispel the myth - the lie - the con! We are the voice of the underdog! Feel free to direct mental health professionals, priests, teachers... to this entry. You'll be doing them a favor, a great service! They will thank you for it. They're supposed to have their collective pulse on the Zeitgeist!
  • Speaking of mental health professionals...  Not all such "homes for unwed mothers" that are depicted in * the Video were run by nuns. To make a long story short - during the early 20th century across the United States, benevolent Christian women operated these "homes for unwed mothers" where unmarried moms would learn how to raise their children and support themselves despite the stigma of illegitimate birth. After World War II, however, social workers saw their chance to make social work a "true" profession and leapt at it! During this dark period of history, social workers pushed out the charity-driven amateurs and these maternity "homes" then became warehouses for young pregnant women and girls. These social workers - the adoption industry - decided it is best to separate the single mother from her child. Social workers convinced the public that THEY are the true "experts in single parenthood." Until the mid-1940s, the Salvation Army and the National Florence Crittenton Mission/Homes and others helped single moms keep their children. Soon thereafter, for instance, the National Florence Crittenton Home abandoned their policy of keeping mom and child together. No money in it! Some Florence Crittenton Homes still shamelessly and boldly operate today, in 2010!
     
At " Watching The Watchers," we were debating whether to publish this entry under the category in the sidebar of this blogcast, "Violence Against Women" or "Is Adoption Humane?" or "Adoption: The Ultimate Violence!" all of which describe the content of this entry to the hilt! We decided to begin a special category, "Adoption: The Violent Industry!" Particularly abhorrent and flagrant in * the Video is the extent to which the single mom of the not too distant past was punished while the single dad received no repercussions whatsoever - not even a slap on the wrist or a slap across the face.

We thank the perspicacious producers of * the Video, entitled, "Sinners" - BBC Northern Ireland and Parallel Film Productions LTD. Productions - who have absolutely and skillfully and brilliantly captured the aura of the times that we are attempting to describe much better than we are able to describe the barbaric experience of "the single mom of the recent past" by way of the written word. As with anything else in Life, you had to be there, as they say. You be the judge. (We view our use of the adjective, barbaric, in the same breath as "adoption industry" to be an insult to barbarians and we apologize to the barbarians of the world because the experience of the single mom has been worse than barbaric!)

In short, to comply with SOCIETAL MORES (rules), single moms of the past were forced to hide in Homes For Unwed Mothers where they left their newborn infants alone on the adoption block to the highest bidder. After living within the comforting waters of Mommy's tummy for 9 months, these babies were left alone with strangers
! (Today some single moms still hide in these "homes.") They did this to protect themselves and their families from ostracism by their society (ostracism by their cheap, low-grade, neighbors - you know who you are). Single moms were forced to sacrifice their children because of the shame, stigma, the disgrace, the AUDACITY of giving birth to one's own offspring while UNmarried. Our goal is to have women, and men, think for themselves and not give a hoot what their low-grade neighbors may think! It's a big world our there! You don't need them! Be smart!

     * Despite our honorable, larger-than-Life forefathers of the 18th century guaranteeing in the United States Constitution the right of every parent, single and married, to parent his, or her, own child, the majority in our society decided to ban together and make up its own rules in the 20th century! In other words, your small, conniving, jealous, dishonorable neighbors made up their own rules about single parenthood. This overriding of the Constitution shows just how powerful societal mores can be!

     * Our forefathers even went as far as to guarantee that the government will financially help single and married parents who cannot afford to raise their children!

From where did the disconnect between the U.S. Constitution and societal mores sprout? Only since the mid-20th century has there been cyclopean pressure on single parents to give their children for adoption! What has been the source of this haughty pressure? Well, of course - MONEY! and JEALOUSY! and a sense of ENTITLEMENT! (Infertile couples believe, "Hey, we're entitled to a child like everybody else!")

(This whole entry is the answer to the aforementioned question.)


Complete families have been (and still are today) coerced and brainwashed into leaving their illegitimate infants (Please see: Notes #2) for infertile but married strangers who follow societal rules to scoop up. This expiation or remedy or atonement was expected of single parents of the 20th century. When you think about it - the whole dance of married strangers with fertility issues being in "the private sexual space of single parents where they don't belong" reeks of incestuousness of the highest order - this incest would fuel the disgraceful adoption industry of the 20th century!

Single moms were forced to hide just like homosexuals of the past were forced to hide, and illegitimate was the offensive and degrading term used to stigmatize the innocent baby of the single mom who was quickly labeled a slut. The adjective was just another avenue with which to extract the child. To seal the deal! To seal the coffins of single moms who have sinned! To make sure the single mom doesn't rear her ugly little head in the future and to make sure the adoptive parents live in peace and harmony, "Let us totally annihilate the psyche of the single mom so she doesn't come back when the pain gets to be too much to bear," was the thinking! Instead of a literal branding iron, illegitimate was the adjective used to brand the innocent gifts that God - Universe brought forth from the bosom of single moms - yet another concept we can thank our idiotic patriarchs for!

During the mid - 20th century, Homes For Unwed Mothers sprouted up in the United States and all over the globe - not exclusively but mostly wherever the pope and/or Christianity ruled. Inside, and outside, these "homes," vulnerable pregnant women and girls, and their complete vulnerable families, were brainwashed out of their healthy, Caucasian, infants by various means of indoctrination to fuel the multi-billion dollar adoption industry. Researchers have called this separation of families an experiment - a way to legitimize the job of the social worker. Besides the legitimization of the profession of social work, we call the adoption process a distribution of wealth, the wealth being the Caucasian infants.

WHO STARTED THE INDUSTRY OF ADOPTION?

The law of supply and demand superlatively and quite simply illustrates the execution of adoption. Simply put ~ a booming market existed (and still exists today) and greedy and unscrupulous, entrepreneurs leapt at the opportunity. There was a demand (infertile couples) for a product (healthy Caucasian babies) and tragically the supply was finagled from vulnerable single moms who had no troglodytes to protect them - single moms were elected to pay the ultimate price! The brainwashing techniques by which scheming marketeers extracted infants was stigma, shame, disgrace, the threat of exile, ostracism.... We're tellin' you - our slimy entrepreneurs are slick! The scheme of the adoption industry (remember - infertile couples are the demand in the adoption industry) went something like this, "...Hmmm, let's make single motherhood a disgrace and set up Homes For Unwed Mothers where single moms will be forced to hide to protect their families from exile and 'voila' we've got ourselves an industry... adoption attorneys, adoption agencies, social workers... yeah, we can get rich! And we can use religion to make it all look legal... on the up and up! Who could object to that? Besides - the sluts can always have more kids! What's the harm!? Infertile couples are ENTITLED to raise a family, too! Let's spread the wealth! What's the big deal? They have to learn to follow the rules! They're sinners!" An adoption execution can cost anywhere from $30,000 to $50,000!!!

A few Homes For Unwed Mothers still brazenly and arrogantly exist; albeit, the indoctrination, the brainwashing, the grooming, is much more subtle befitting the times that we live in since shame and stigma... no longer work quite so well. Although, in religious circles, these brainwashing techniques by which to extract children from the vulnerable still work quite nicely. Today slick, shameless, titans advertise on the Internet, "...Pregnant? If you're alone with your secret, we can help...."

In 2010 C.E., procuring infants for infertile couples to adopt is tougher so the adoption industry has conjured up new ways of separating families. There are many new tricks of the adoption trade. The following are only 8 new flagrant brainwashing techniques currently used to extricate children from the vulnerable:
  • The hiding places, Homes For Unwed Mothers, are now called dormitories. Sounds more collegiate!
  • Beware! The adoption worker of today is a wolf in sheep's clothing! Typically, the worker puts a warm and soothing hand of friendship on the shoulder of a vulnerable single mom, "I want what's best for you. I understand what you're going through. I'm here to help you. You are in charge." Yeah, help yourself to my baby? The single mom admirably seeks help and education and support and the shysters trick her out of her child!
This trickery would be somewhat analogous to "entrapment" which the last time we checked is against the law!
  • Don't let them fool you with the "what's best for the child" or "in the best interest of the child" trick! You are what's best for your child!!! Don't harm your child by abandoning him, or her, to strangers via adoption!
  • Losing a child to adoption is today called making "an adoption plan." That's about as disgraceful and sinister a tactic as the adoption industry can conjure up! Words have enormous power and adoption titans know that.
  • A vulnerable single mom today admirably seeking counsel about parenting is groomed to view and describe herself as "not ready to parent." (Adoption worker to single mom: "Honey, don't worry, we understand. You have a few more classes to study. We'll help you finish school. Let a couple take your baby while you finish school and build your future." Envision the adoption worker's (including adoption attorneys) warm and soothing hand of friendship on the shoulder, again. The single mom comes looking for help and guidance from so-called professionals and they help themselves to her baby!
  • Hard to believe, but in closed adoption of the past the natural mom/victim was denied any and all information about her lost child for eternity!
Since the tricks of the 20th century like shame and stigma and closed adoption don't work so well in 2010 C.E., family separators, adoption entrepreneurs, and adoption titans, have been forced to invent a new trick called open adoption which is done by way of a "gentleman's agreement" which adoptive parents have been known to break in a heartbeat! The industry even shamelessly and arrogantly refers to open adoption as a marketing tool! How much more proof do you need!? You're viewed as "a market," people!

Open adoption is supposed to give the natural mom some contact with her child, like pictures, cards, letters, or a yearly visit, as her child grows but the law does not bind adoptive parents to any such farce of a contract. Adoptive parents are allowed to skip town at any time and not let the natural mom know where they've skedaddled with her child. The law protects the adoptive parents! Open adoption is like making an agreement with a handshake.

     "Trade ya' - a couple a' pictures a year for your healthy, White, infant!"

The single mom today is given a supposed "choice" of open adoption vs closed adoption but, more often than not, there is a change of heart in midstream for adoptive parents in an open adoption. As these strangers bond with the child that belongs to another, suddenly open adoption is not quite as appealing as before when they would do and say anything to obtain a child.
  • Today the adoption industry has been forced to allow the single mom to choose the couple that will adopt her baby. Give us a break! What's that supposed to mean? She gets to pick someone out of a lineup of pictures! How demeaning can you get? "Let me pick my abuser! Let me pick my oppressor! Let me pick my victimizers! Oh, gee, thanks!"
  • God and religion are shamefully and shamelessly still used by the adoption industry. Vulnerable single moms of today who choose the adoption route are brainwashed, groomed, to think that, "...God caused my pregnancy for a bigger plan. God has a plan for me and my child. God has shown me the way. God is good. God has a reason. God told me what to do. God made me do it. God will forgive my sin if I give my child to an infertile couple who follow the rules and, hence, deserve my child. I must be punished. I am a sinner...."  
Albeit, we can guarantee that these vulnerable single moms who succumb to the whims of powerful adoption titans are not going to think that when they are older and see the light. With maturity, they will see how they have been tricked out of their children. There is an unfortunateness about gaining wisdom with age - wisdom is gained from living Life. Wisdom is attained with age at which time one is able to see "the whole picture" of one's Life - when it's too late

SPEAKING OF GOD:

We don't mind people invoking the name of God during a conversation - even a few times is ok - but every other word gets to be annoying and disrespectful to the listener. It's as if the speaker is attempting to convince the listener that by saying God's name numerous times during a conversation, the listener will be thoroughly convinced that God loves the speaker best. The listener is supposed to rest assured that the speaker is a good person just because he, or she, has mentioned God's name umpteen times. It's immature, childish, of the speaker and insulting to the listener. How often have our eyes glazed over listening to such a speaker? Very often!

     * It's usually only one speaker in a conversation that has the pomposity to invoke God's name continually. How comedical would the scenario be with both speakers or many speakers invoking God's name in a conversation at the same time? Shouldn't that be reserved for religion class in school? Usually, it's one kind and generous listener who, with glazed-over eyes, is forced to listen to the overbearing speaker. Don't be so kind all the time, loyal listeners! Take off in midstream! Look at your watch and explain, "Hey! It's been real nice! I gotta' go, now! See ya' later, alligator!"

     * The supererogatory use of God's name by weak and brainwashed moms who lose kids to adoption - every other word in a sentence is God's name - borders on "Taking the name of the Lord, thy God, in vain" which, we believe, according to the 2nd Commandment of The 10 Commandments of most religions is something we are commanded not to do. (Please see: Notes #3) Using God's name in vain is a sin according to most religions. God does not need moronic publicity. God has been doing fine without our invoking His name at every turn.

     * Besides these brainwashed moms, our political leaders all too often speak, and promote themselves, via the God route. Immature and inadequate "leaders" (underachievers) invoke God's name at every turn, too. We're supposed to be convinced, then, that they're on the straight and narrow. We're supposed to rest assured that they're honorable and trustworthy people. "So, vote for me. God loves me best."

More than likely, we have all spewed one or two profane words in our lifetime even if only under our collective breath. Our illustrious religionists of the past preached that people who are not good at expressing themselves use profanity. We say that people who overly pepper their conversation with God's name are not good at expressing themselves! We assume it's rewarding to blame every move we make on God? We assume it's convenient and comforting to think that we're not responsible for what happens to us in this Life? Don't forget - God always has that reason. We believe this is an irrational way to view Life and God.

At "Watching The Watchers," we love God! Yet, we wouldn't presume to foist our God and religion on you, so please do not foist your religion on us! Keep your private beliefs about your God to yourself during normal conversation about baseball, for instance. The previous two emboldened sentences in this paragraph are NOT meant for our loyal readers who Watch The Watchers with us; we totally welcome and encourage our readers to share ALL your beliefs about any and every thing in Life - that's what this venue is for! We learn from each other! WE NEED YOU! to foist your beliefs on us!

BESIDES USING QUESTIONABLE LANGUAGE, WE ALL DO SOMETHING ELSE!

Occasionally, or even often, we all tell ourselves positive lies to survive emotional pain and anxiety. These comforting lies are called psychological defense mechanisms which (1) deny, falsify, and distort reality and (2) operate unconsciously so we are not aware of them.

Young moms who succumb to the new trick of open adoption, and adoption, in general, tell themselves positive things to survive the pain. They'll pull up their defense mechanisms to survive the pain and anxiety of creating a child out of wedlock and feeling society's vast pressure to give the child to deserving married strangers who follow the rules; but, with maturity and the wisdom that maturity brings, they will see how they have been taken advantage of - tricked. They will realize that they have been duped. They will realize the enormity of the gifts that they have lost!

     * There is no greater gift in Life than the reproduction of oneself - a child! Certainly a piddling job is not greater than the gift of a child! A career is not greater than a child! A house? A car? A college degree? We don't think so! We implore you: you won't try to compare a few college courses to the gift of a child? Will you?

Without summoning their defense mechanisms, moms who lose children to adoptive strangers would be emotionally, and even physically, immobile and couldn't go on with Life. Sometimes, the pain of Life is almost too much to bear. Some defense mechanisms that help us in our time of need are:

*  Rationalization
*  Repression
*  Projection
*  Reaction Formation
*  Displacement
*  Intellectualization
*  Suppression

We walk away from the aforementioned 8 NEW BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES shaking our heads in disbelief and wonderment:

"WHY IS THIS MUCH TIME AND ENERGY NOT SPENT ON KEEPING THE FAMILY TOGETHER!?"


For instance, substitute "not read to parent" for "ready to parent," "adoption plan" for "family plan"... Not AS MUCH money in it? Right? We assume there are enough true orphans in the world without extended families to fuel the greed and the sense of entitlement of adopters?

Why don't a few reputable "entrepreneurs" spend a fraction of the time keeping families together!?

We laud the famed and celebrated Cleveland Clinic Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio, for offering parenting classes and support for teen parents, and all parents - classes most of our own parents would have benefited from!

BACK TO THE BEGINNINGS OF THE ADOPTION INDUSTRY
IN
THE
mid - 20th CENTURY:


You ask, "Why Caucasian? What about African-American, Chinese... infants?"

Sorry, no adoption market for Black kids in the past. Black single moms and their families were the lucky ones! Their families remained together. Noone wanted to adopt Black kids in the past. Besides that, the White man wanted to keep the Black man down. (Research supports this theory.) The White man thought by allowing Blacks to keep their illegitimate kids, the Black man would remain down and out and poor, but that's not what happened at all. Black single parents thrived, and continue to thrive, with their families intact. Blacks had the last laugh! We think that after slavery there is just no way that Whitey was taking (via adoption) the Black kids, too!

As we have attempted to illustrate, the majority rules - not just in politics! The majority in every society makes the mores/rules that the members of a society will live by. Until recently, an American citizen either followed these societal mores, or rules, or one was simply and casually, even vehemently, ostracized by their simpleton- neighbor. Where does one go after one is exiled from his, or her, society? All victims who have been labeled as unworthy of participating fully in the mainstream of Life, who have been forced to remain in the closet of Life, and who are today inching their way out of the closet, we thank you for your courage and hard work toward dignity and freedom for all! Thank you for paving the way for others!

CAREER WOMEN OF THE PAST:

During our patriarchal past, even single career women who became pregnant lost their infants to adoption just because they were unmarried; these young women certainly earned plenty of money with which to care for their children but the rule is the rule - the societal rule! Keeping their children would have caused them to lose their jobs and landlords would not rent to single moms - and not too long ago, either, a few short decades ago!

PROSPECTIVE MARRIED COUPLES:

More often than not in the past, engaged couples married right after losing a child to adoption; the price of NOT being ostracized by their society, by their goofy neighbors, though, was no illegitimate children allowed - the child of a prospective married couple had to go for adoption! Hard to believe? Right? Well, there's more! Our goofy society even counted backwards 9 months from the birth of a married couple's 1st child to see if the couple had engaged in pre-marital sex! How intrusively incestuous can a society - your neighbor - get!? People should get a Life and stay out of the sexual affairs of their neighbor!

THE BRAVE FAMILY:

In the past, there was a brave family with self-esteem here and there that kept the child born to a single family member. Sometimes, Grandma or an Aunt would say the illegitimate child is hers and the family was kept together that way. Prior to the 20th century, there was no such entity or institution as adoption! (You won't give the ridiculous example of Moses being adopted by the Pharaoh and therefore taking the children of another is ok! Man, people will stoop to all kinds of trickery! We can safely say we have heard it all!)

UNDERDOGS HAVE BEEN KILLED in the United States:

Being the underdog is serious business!

In the United States, besides single parents, gays are a minority, too. Gays who have bravely come out of the closet at the wrong time in the 20th century have been killed! Today, we still see the farcical, "Don't ask, don't tell," rule pertaining to homosexuals in the American armed forces. Today, President Ahmadinejad says there are no homosexuals in Iran so we can only assume that any homosexual coming out of the Iranian closet would be jailed or killed.

EVERYBODY KNOWS the trick BUT THE VICTIM:

We don't think vulnerable people realize exactly how SOCIETAL MORES (rules) influence them because the vulnerable are too busy trying to survive and, hence, can be more easily taken advantage of - tricked - when they're not looking! Hold on tight to your dreams! And your kids!

One example of the climate surrounding single moms of the past: In the United States in the year 2000 C.E., a couple friends of "Watching The Watchers" were sitting in the waiting room of a business as a toddler who looked to be of Colombian descent played on the floor. One of them, perhaps, asked the nationality of the cute little boy. "Oh, he's from Peru," the female adult casually and pretty adamantly quipped - there was no doubt in her mind. "Unwed mothers, they hide! The pope runs the country there!" So, everybody knows (and knew in the past) the trick by which babies were, and are, forced from the vulnerable single mom but the single mom! All of the savvy tricksters, including infertile couples, prospective adoptive parents, know (and knew in the past) the various avenues - the brainwashing techniques - used to trick vulnerable families out of their children, and they're obviously ok with it! Hm-hm.

BIRTHMOTHER VS BIRTHER:

Adoption titans have thought up new nomenclature to help quell the guilt and heart palpitations of infertile couples and adoptive parents throughout the Life of the child they adopt. For instance, the creepy (makes the skin creepy-crawl) and politically-incorrect, demeaning, insulting term, birthmother, allows infertile couples to rationalize (a defense mechanism) in their own minds and convince themselves that it's ok to take the child that is born from the body, the egg and semen, and the ancestry of another! That takes some doing - taking the child that doesn't belong to you takes some doing! What audacity it must take!? A male New York mental health professional who is also adopted, and THE ONLY internationally-renowned and respected EXPERT in adoption, and also friend of "Watching The Watchers" says he couldn't take a goldfish from another!

To quell the guilt of - to groom - prospective adoptive parents,
the titans of adoption have invented the term, birthmother, which implies distance between the single mom and her child - the term is meant to make her appear like a non-mother! It is analogous to the n-word. The adoption industry is currently considering the use of the term, birther, when referring to the natural mother of an adopted child. (How do ya' like that one, ladies and girls? Are you insulted, yet!?) The industry continues to stoop to new lows! Why not just call her an incubator!? Or, a baby machine? Single moms, hold on tight to your dreams! And your kids! Or be smart and get some troglodytes to protect you, if you must!

Of course, there will always be some vulnerable single mom with low self-esteem who will not realize that she is being insulted and demeaned and programmed by the use of the disgusting term - birthmother. The subtle, yet profound, brainwashing continues throughout her Life each time she is called birthmother - long after mom is separated from her child. To keep the single mom in her place, to assure she won't interfere with adoptive parents, the brainwashing continues in all sorts of media, for instance! The use of that word subty and profoundly reminds her that she only gave birth to a child!

More accurate and acceptable terms are natural mom (a mom created by God or nature) or 1st mom. Or, how about just plain ole' mom? Leave the adopted kid with some dignity! Let him just have two moms! We do it all the time with stepchildren! Why do you put the adoption noose around the neck of the child born to a single mom? Isn't Life tough enough without the extra weight and burden of dealing with adoption's repercussions throughout the lifetime of the adopted individual? The stigma of adoption always lingers. Not to mention the equally and superlatively unnecessary noose around the neck of the single mom - the extra weight and burden of dealing with adoption's repercussions throughout the lifetime of the single mom! Isn't Life tough enough!?

THE SINGLE DAD:

A few short decades ago, it was like "the end of the world" for a family to discover that an unmarried daughter is pregnant. The unmarried son? Not so much! He was thought of as a he-man, an Italian- Stallion, for instance. In some indoctrinated religious circles, today, this scenario is still traumatic for the daughter in a family and still not at all traumatic for the son. We, of course, feel that every child is a gift to every family, and tribe, into which the child is born! The unmarried mom is not a baby machine or incubator for infertile couples! What audacity it must take to finagle the child from another!

HERITAGE:
  • Expectant grandparents:
Follow Sarah Palin's lead! Keep your tribe together and your ancestry in check! Don't allow entrepreneurs to put so little value on your tribe! Don't allow family separators to separate your family members - your irreplaceable gifts from God!

There's a television ad out. Don't let the television ad that Sarah's daughter (Bristol) is promoting discourage you! In the ad, Bristol condescendingly claims that her family's wealth and fame enable her to keep HER  illegitimate child something which the average young single mom won't be able to do as easily, she says. Like a haughty parent, Bristol attempts to teach us, "Don't do as I do, do as I say! What's good for me is not good for you!" That methodology never worked for any other parent down through the ages! Why will it suddenly change the collective minds and sexual habits of a world audience of young kids when Bristol says it? Pretty haughty!? Huh? Bristol Palin is just trying to save face by way of those ads! Certainly her peers don't watch Fox News, where the ad was advertised. Bristol's handlers really think you people are dummies! RICH, or POOR, there is just no way that anyone else is getting their slimy paws on Sarah Palin's grandchild! Just try it! She'll use that rifle ( that she always speaks of ) on you! Keeping and raising your child is all about self-esteem!
  • Expectant family relatives:
Don't allow your heritage to be diluted! Don't sit back and watch one of your clan get lost in the adoption industry. Have some self-esteem about yourselves!

     * In Indian culture (India), one's name tells the whole heritage and story of one's Life, the house one lives in, perhaps even the street on which one lives.

     * Hebrew names tell the whole identifying story, too.

     * In European villages, one's home is referred to by the name of the previous resident who resided there, perhaps, decades or a century earlier. For instance, the name of one's home or house would be alluded to with something like, "Oh, yeah, Caleigh Brooks lives by the Smith's," and the Smith family likely lived in the house decades or centuries earlier. Across the board, the emphasis is on family and heritage, as it should be.
  • Expectant moms:
We're baffled! Do parents, actually, imbecilely compare parenting to a job, a paying 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM job? Surely, you've all heard the hackneyed proclamations from stressed-out parents, "Parenting is the hardest job in the world!?" At "Watching The Watchers," we couldn't disagree more with this fallacy!!! Parenting is not as difficult as "they" make it out to be! It's just another trick!

ALL PARENTS WHO THINK PARENTING IS SO DIFFICULT, JUST PUT YOUR KIDS UP FOR ADOPTION! What's the problem!?

Don't let "them" fool you! Parenting children is quite simple, and enjoyable! (Of course, parenting children with mental illness is sad and not quite as enjoyable as parenting should be.) We believe wholeheartedly that the root of problems with children is the inadequacy of parents - poor parenting skills (Go ahead! Ask Dr. Phil!) We believe that infants are "blank slates" - tabula rase. If you run into a problem, a crick in the road of parenting, "Seek professional help! Don't cry about it! Get yourself and your children some counseling!" (something most of our parents could have used)

Have some self-esteem about yourselves! Parent smartly! Single moms, don't be martyrs! Don't give your irreplaceabe gifts away! Don't give a part of yourself away! Otherwise, well be hearing from a tearful you in a couple of decades after you haven't been able to produce any other children. Sometimes, God only gives us the gift of ONE child! Young vulnerable moms think that since they gave birth once, they will give birth a 2nd time, but as we all know this is not always the case.

We are also well aware that one child does not replace another! Giving birth to a 2nd child doesn't replace the 1st child. A mom always remembers! So, just take the gift that God - Universe has given you and run with it! Enjoy!

Take parenting your child one step at a time, one day at a time, like everyone else does! Don't think of the whole legal 18 years of parenting a child to adulthood all at once! Nobody else does! That's what the adoption industry wants you to do! Don't be so hard on yourself! That's what the adoption industry is counting on! The adoption industry has their proverbial fingers crossed hoping you'll talk yourself right out of parenting your child! Family separators, that includes adoptive families, are VERY shrewd! They're likely older than you and more experienced at Life.

     So, to those who, insultingly, keep insisting that parenting is the hardest job in the world, we say:
  • Losing a child, via adoption or death, is the hardest job in the world! You certainly wouldn't dare argue with us about that! Would you?
  • Mental illness is the hardest job!
  • War is the hardest job!
  • Being a minority, an underdog, is the hardest job in the world!
  • Being an amputee or a paraplegic is the hardest job in the world!

INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION

     Speaking of the heritage:

Traveling to various continents to finagle children from the vulnerable has been the new trend in adoption. The reason slick and savvy American shoppers today scoot overseas to pluck off children is twofold: 


(a)  Single moms simply aren't cooperating in the United States of America like they did in the past.  They're not that prolific! They're not producing!


(b)  There is much less chance of intrusion by the natural moms and families from which the children are extricated.
The poor mom isn't likely to hop on an airplane to America from Russia or China to get a glimpse of her lost child. We find this particularly amoral and unethical! Taking children from parents simply because they are poor is markedly abhorrent and disgraceful! How do these adoptive parents sleep at night with an Asian child sleeping in the next room knowing that family is half way around the world? Just wondering which defense mechanisms such adoptive parents employ to stop the heart palpitations and the guilt?

At least celebrities who finagle kids from poor parents of countries around the world return to said country of the child's origin and open a school, for example. They cough up a few million bucks to quell their guilt - to rectify and justify the taking of the child of another! But, the majority of adopters don't have that luxury! Yep, money will just about buy you anything! Except, of course, integrity and honor! Nope, money won't buy you respect!

REUNION:

That brings us to the end - reunion:   

Isn't it a horrible thought? A pitiful mom waiting 40 years, or more, to look for and HOPE to reconnect with her adult child! It's insulting to the hilt! WHAT KIND OF ADOPTIVE FAMILY WOULD WISH THAT ON ANYBODY!? What audacity it must take to adopt the child of another!? A pitiful mom hoping she passes the test of being worthy enough of her own child? Adoption is a living death! Some part of your lost child will be emotionally scarred! Is that what you want? In reunion, you'll always be on anguishing tenterhooks, "Have I said too much? Will he call, again? Should I not have spoken of my pain? Have I offended? Will this be the last time we talk? Will this be the last time I see him?"

Also, don't forget, if you're in a so-called open adoption, adoptive parents can close that door in a heartbeat! By law, they don't have to give you any kind of contact with your child even though they said they would!


NO MEDIA FOR THE VICTIM! ONLY FOR THE VICTOR!

Why is there so little value placed on family and heritage in 2010 C.E. in the United States!? Because the media is powerful and because adoptive parents minimize the single parent in the media every day - just by virtue of possessing the child of the single parent! The losers of the children are never on television or in any other kind of media! The media doesn't want to hear from those families who have lost kids to adoption! Why is that!? Because the adoption industry is too powerful! Adoptive families are big spenders. Single parents are presumed to be poor and inferior! (See how "they" think about you!?) Adoptive families it is presumed buy the products that the media advertises! Also, the media feels that single parents are depressing - trailer-park trash! Why put them on tv?

Don't allow the media to keep sending out the message to society that your family is unimportant! The way to stop the media from broadcasting your unimportance is don't allow your relatives to be adopted! Here are some questions to ponder about the media:

     * Why are only adoptive parents in the media touting their adoptive lives?

     * Why are single moms who lose kids to adoption not allowed the same voice in the media? Why are single parents not given the same access to the media that adoptive parents enjoy?

     * Why don't callous adoptive parents and the media give one iota about hurting the feelings of the millions of families from whom the kids have been extracted while single moms, and their
families, who are tricked out of their kids continue to protect the feelings of the adoptive parents? Who the hell are you, adoptive strangers!? Those days are over, baby! The flagrant and brazenly joyous flaunting of the human acquisitions of adoptive parents in the media - - - the utter disrespect and disregard for the feelings of the natural parents who have been separated from their children through adoption - - - are why we have no qualms about being as frank and honest as we have been in this commentary! YOU would want nothing less? Would you!? Riiiight? Honesty is the best policy!? Riiiight? What's good for the goose, we assume, is still good for the gander! Riiiight!?

     * Why is the victim still expected, forced, to protect the aggressor/predator in 2010 C.E.? That is the ultimate question. In our society, (1) single moms are, first, tricked out of their children and then (2) single moms are expected to elevate the adoptive parents/predators and lower themselves!? SINGLE MOMS GIVE THEIR KIDS TO STRANGERS AND THEN PRAISE THE STRANGERS! Why the hell is that!? (Pardon our French.) Why does this dynamic occur? Well, of course, we know the answer is low self-esteem (and brainwashing) - that's precisely what the adoption industry is counting on!

Don't let 'em have your kids, and then praise them, too!

Don't let adoptive parents have your kids
and then defer to adoptive parents, too!
Don't be that idiotic!
 
How many different ways can we say it!?
Where's your self-esteem?

We know

* first
they rob you of your self-esteem
* then
 they rob you of your child!
We know how brainwashing works!


We also know
* * * After awhile the oppressor doesn't have to work so hard.
The victim takes over for the oppressor

Don't be afraid!
Single moms, don't be afraid!
ALL parents are afraid in the beginning! }


     * If single moms who lose their kids to adoption do such a good thing, why don't we hear from them? Or about them!? Why does the media push single moms to the background? If adoption is so great, why the big secret? Because out in the open, adoption wouldn't fly so well! How long should the shame of bearing a child while single linger? Why are adoptive parents made so superior? 

We think this says it all!

Why are you not important in your society? Because advertising single moms who lose the kids to adoption wouldn't be good for business! Adoption would be seen as the disgusting and predatory act that it is! Single moms, and families, you owe it to those who will come after you to keep your families together! Don't elevate others and put yourselves down! Elevate yourselves! Don't praise others by remaining in the background! Don't defer to people! It's a big world out there! Get help!
 
DR. PHIL GETS THE LAST WORD:

For once, he put a positive spin on NOT putting a child on the adoption block! (Please see: Notes #4) On a recent Dr. Phil show, he said, "Don't think that your family is too dysfunctional for you to keep and raise your baby. My family, and childhood, was so dysfunctional that, if anything, social workers would have put us up for adoption!" The audience chuckled at the way he contradicted a pregnant mom who was thinking about adoption for her child because her brother is supposedly dysfunctional. Thanks, Dr. Phil, for once telling the truth about adoption! Show us a family that is not dysfunctional and we'll show you a family that IS dysfunctional because - anyone who thinks his, or her, family is perfect is obviously dysfunctional AND delusional!

N O T E S:

#1  We're being facetious. *The Video is not a treat! It's disgusting! And criminal!

#2  The illegitimate stamp:  For your enjoyment and elucidation we looked up the definition of the adjective, illegitimate, on Dictionary.com which is one of our favorite websites. We're curious whether this term is still stamped on the birth certificates of the offspring of single parents? And when did that change?

( Single moms of the past weren't allowed to put the name of the dads on the birth certificates of their children. The industry didn't want to know. "They" didn't want a dad around to complicate things! )


Would the powerful people really still have the nerve in 2010 C.E.!?

You can thank our idiotic patriarchs for yet another disgusting custom of the United States!

Below is the heavy noose put around the neck of an innocent gift from God - Universe. Illegitimate is the label by which the adoption industry has separated, and continues to separate, vulnerable families! The aura of "the illegitimate child" is still alive and well in the 21st century! Illegitimate means:
  • Outlawed
  • Baseborn
  • Misbegotten
  • Unauthorized
  • Illicit
  • Bastard
  • Invalid
#3  The numbering of The 10 Commandments differs in the various religions, i.e., the #2 Commandment in one religion can be #3 in a different religion.

#4  Dr. Phil is an American psychologist who has his own hour-long daily television program during which he helps people with psychological problems of the day. Billionaire Oprah Winfrey made Dr. Phil who he is today.

TOPICS AT A GLANCE
  • * the Video
  • Societal mores (rules)
  • Supply and Demand
  • Zeitgeist
  • U.S. Constitution guarantee
  • 8 New Brainwashing Techniques in 2010 C.E.
  • Dormitories
  • Beware of the world in sheep's clothing!
  • What's best for the child?
  • An adoption plan
  • Not ready to parent
  • The empty choice: closed vs open adoption
  • Open adoption - the marketing tool
  • Choose the infertile couple that will victimize you
  • God and Religion
  • Defense mechanisms
  • Blacks and adoption
  • Career women and adoption
  • Prospective married couples and adoption
  • The brave families
  • Underdogs have been killed
  • Don't ask, don't tell
  • Everybody knows but the vulnerable victim
  • Words have enormous power
  • Birthmother or Birth mother
  • Birther
  • The n-word
  • The single dad in our society
  • Heritage
  • Expectant grandparents (Sarah Palin)
  • Expectant family relatives
  • India
  • Hebrews
  • Europe
  • United States
  • Expectant moms
  • Parenting isn't quite the hardest job in the world
  • Sometimes you only get one gift
  • No media for the victim - only the victor
  • Reunion
  • Dr. Phil

 * If you haven't yet,
please make sure you read the May, 2010, entry in this blogcast
about
boycotting Elisabeth Hasselbeck,
entitled,
"Get The Bitch Off  The !@#% Air, ABC!" 

WE NEED YOU!
to be informed.

{ You never know when you will need to be informed!
Life has a way of pouncing on us!
Be prepared!
Thank you for participating! }


And most of all,

Enjoy!

Get The Bitch Off The !@#% Air, ABC!!!

                  Is she still on!?

     Nooooo! WE HAVEN'T FORGOTTEN!


                   Let Us Blame The Victim,
                               by all means!
                               
                            { b o y c o t t }


What's Elisabeth Hasselbeck still doin' on the air, ABC!?
We know that we will make her appear endearing, even 
persecuted, to some inconsequentials and misguiders 
by our simply calling attention to her sexually deviant and 
oppressive humor (We assume she meant to be funny?)
and the casualness and laudation with which our society
responds to such pathetic deviancy - now, now, don't get 
weepy on us! Yes, this is a teaching moment, class, for 
especially you "guys" in your ivory towers!

We always try to put political parties, nationalities, race...
aside, and not judge each other by our polity as much as
we do, as a society, yet sometimes it is unavoidable. 
Let us judge severely, instead, the actions and verbiage 
of people toward their vulnerable neighbor. Bitching 
about politics is one thing, but mocking and reprimanding
and blaming victims who have experienced personal and 
private trauma is quite tasteless, to say the very least!

We know that Hasselbeck likes to flaunt her political 
party and her religiosity - for ratings. We get the picture.  
We know that God loves her best! This commentary is
about compounded trauma - the disrespect and abuse
of the abused ...the underdog! Kicking people, literally,
and even sometimes kicking people verbally, when 
they're down, is criminal! Uniquely and particularly 
abhorrent is kicking people in the teeth verbally! 

We are calling for a boycott of products advertised by
ABC until Elisabeth Hasselbeck is fired! It's a new day!
It's a new world! Victims and survivors are no longer
going to tolerate disrespect from the so-called elite.
We have to start somewhere, and we're sorry to say,
"Hasselbeck, you're it!" (At the end of this entry,
please see:
notes
)



NO! WE HAVEN'T FORGOTTEN, ABC! & WE NEVER WILL! ...if you keep shoving her in our faces!

Every time we see, or think of, ABC's "The View," (Please see: Notes) or any of its hosts, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar... we NATURALLY, and hauntingly, will remember! It is simply the way life works! What'd you think we are? Morons? You're going to slap us in the face, and we're just gonna' forget about it?

We don't want to begin our priceless and precious days with Elisabeth, and her malicious remarks, on our minds! Expecting us to forget that infamous segment of "The View" is analogous to telling us to not remember the elephant in the room. Or, telling a rape victim to not remember the rapist. Across the globe, victims/survivors, and especially victims of sex crimes, and their loved ones, will remember every time they see Elisabeth Hasslebeck! Get rid of her! We don't care what her political party is, victims across the globe want her outta' there. Get her off the airwaves! Victims want her off of "The View!" She just has left a bad taste in our collective mouths! Get her off the air, ABC! We get depressed watching Elisabeth during our brunch; we require calmness and uplifting during brunch. The constant sound of her squeaky, staccato, chatter NOW makes our hearts palpitate, metaphorically, and even literally!

Or, we will simply refuse to buy the products that you advertise, ABC! It is simply the way Life works. Plenty of victims out there buyin' plenty of products! Life leaves few of us unscathed.

In fact...

With all due respect, Elisabeth sounds like she should get treated for A.D.D. (Attention Deficit Disorder) if it's going to be an obstacle to her performance on television. {We're not sure if it's appropriate to say that? Oh, well, if anyone complains, we'll just give a teary apology, and say, "Oops, we made a mistake, we're SO sorry," and we WILL expect forgiveness! Kindly treat us like you treat Elisabeth!}

{An attorney-friend of "Watching The Watchers" told us recently that he has A.D.D. and he says, "It's a gift!" For us that was an educational, eye-opening, remark and we thank him for sharing.}

ABC, recently when Elisabeth had a day off from "The View," we realized how truly distracting her presence is! She NOW sounds sillier than ever. We picture the childish tattletale, Elisabeth, wide-eyed and breathless, running up to her Mommy, tugging at Mommy's shirt-tails, 'Mommy, Mommy, I have a cool joke about Erin...." We hate to say it: we almost kind of felt sorry for a broken Elisabeth. She looks "small" to us. And we cannot make her appear bigger. We don't respect her, anymore. What're ya' gonna' do? It is simply the way Life works! 

For those of you who may not have heard of the imbecility (definitely a euphemism): Erin Andrews, a sideline reporter at ESPN sporting events (Please see: Notes), has been stalked and filmed for some time through the peepholes of the various hotel rooms that she stayed in while broadcasting sports events across the country.  The stalker would call the hotels beforehand and was freely given a room next to Erin's room at which time he would proceed to finagle the peephole of the door of her room in order to videotape a naked Ms. Andrews preparing for bed. Then, a couple of weeks ago, Erin danced on the television program, "Dancing With The Stars" (Please see: Notes) 

Erin told the judge at the hearing to give the stalker the harsher prison sentence of 5 years behind bars instead of the 2 1/2 years that he was given. The predator, of course, gave a teary apology, said he made a mistake, and skidaddled to psychological treatment. See, Elisabeth, you are all alike!!! 

What's left for Erin and her family after the trauma: In short, her family - and especially Erin - will be re-traumatized every day for the rest of their lives because the stalker scattered his nude videos of Erin all over the Internet; he even tried to sell the videos to TMZ - that's one stupid stalker! Let us emphasize that Erin did nothing wrong, yet she is subjected to cruel taunts from sports fans when she works as a sideline reporter. People tell her she brought it on herself. Some imply that she was a party to the crime. She fears for her life every time she enters a hotel. She suffers from humiliation, nightmares, fear, and anxiety.... ESPN has had to pay for extra security for Erin and has incurred heavy losses from assissting the government in its investigation. The authorities think that the stalker filmed 16 other women.

And, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, a Republican and the token religious zealot on the late morning television program, "The View," thinks this is funny; albeit, we're not certain how funny she thinks it is, today, since we hope that her job is somewhat in jeopardy - now, now, don't get weepy on us. Republicans say that the media is always picking on them; well, perhaps there's alot to pick on?

With one quip of her foul mouth, on May 4, 2010, Elisabeth mentored the stalker-predator from her ivory tower at ABC's "The View" with encouragement like, "Oh, don't be a stupid pervert! Nothin' we hate more than a stupid pervert! Don't go to jail for stalking and taking pictures of a gorgeous nude sportscaster through a peephole! Just be patient! Wait! You can see the same nude Erin on 'Dancing With The Stars' and get the same thrill," or something to that effect. Don't hold us to the exact syllable. After that advice and counsel to the man who stalked Erin Andrews, the audience of "The View" laughed wholeheartedly; yet, for some odd reason, we don't think that the world audience was laughing with them in unison! Although, we're pretty sure that the audience was somewhat taken aback and laughed out of sheer discomfort - nervous laughter.

We take that back, on 2nd thought, it wasn't a quip, we saw another clip of the incident and we realized that the camera really closed in, and stayed focused, on Elisabeth's face for what-seemed-like a long time; she told a whole little story about the convicted felon. What glee on her face as she told it! She looked absolutely childish - like a kid running up to her Mommy, tugging on Mommy's apron strings, and breathily telling her silly side of something or other. {We know we're repeating ourselves. We just haven't decided which one of these sentences to take out yet. Although, the last sentence about Mommy does bear repeating.}

ABC, your show, "The View," is now tainted! It must seem miniscule to you, ABC, because we still see a haughty Elisabeth on the air.  Any one who makes fun of crimes, expecially crimes of a sexual nature which annihilate the very sexuality, the feelings of safety, the utter being of another/a neighbor, says volumes about the joker. In every such joke and utterance is some tinge of truth about the jokester - makes her equal to the stalker-predator! Dah! Who would think of that!? NEVER IN OUR WILDEST DREAMS would Elisabeth Hasselbeck's wisecracks have occurred to us! It must have been on her mind the whole evening after "Dancing With The Stars" and the next morn; we think she couldn't wait "to share" on "The View." We don't think her beliefs and thoughts about a naked Erin just came to her out of the clear blue on the show - under pressure. We'll even go as far as to say that she wrote her joke down. The hosts prepare for those shows together and, alone, in the privacy of their minds. They're always thinking about how to boost their ratings. We envision her up all night, tossing-n-turning, salivating at the thought of "sharing" the cool joke about Erin and anticipating the boost to her ratings and overall appeal. We get the ratings picture!

Just about every person on the planet has watched, "Dancing With The Stars," one of the television programs that America copied from Great Britain, and we have all observed the beautifully, yet scantily, clad female dancers on the program, and most of us haven't given the costumes of the dancers much of a thought besides admiration for them. We admire beauty in all its forms. Most of us are too busy watching the swift dance moves.

And in comes, Ms Hasselbeck merely, and haughtily, reprimanding the beautiful Erin Andrews who was stalked and filmed by a positively normal-looking pervert-criminal whose friends and neighbors, if asked, would more than likely say, "...Gee, whillikers, we didn't think he could hurt a fly, he seemed like such a nice guy. He seemed like he didn't have a mean bone in his body...."

GLARING OBSERVATION #1: (We totally hesitate to compliment because, as soon as we do, people disappoint!) We know that Joy Behar, who we adore, has described Ms. Hasselbeck with the words, "Elisabeth is a Republican. Yes, we disagree, but Elisabeth doesn't have a mean bone in her body. She couldn't hurt a fly" (or a flea?)

Well, Joy - your Elisabeth hurt more than a fly or a flea. She hurt multitudinous fleas across the globe. We've all heard of murderers... for example, that have been spoken of as highly by their friends and neighbors, "...By golly, we just didn't think he could hurt a flea. He was always so kind and gentle...." We hear these kinds of assessments in the news continually about murderers and sexual deviants - now, now don't start feeling sorry for a brazen Elisabeth like we knew you would. She's a big girl. She gets the big bucks to be critiqued by her public. She laughs all the way to the bank. Think, instead, of the victims that SHE hurt!!! We, survivors of trauma, will not be silenced! Don't protect your abusers!

We have also heard countless times how the friends and relatives of other criminals - rapists, pedophiles... describe theses perpetrators with, "Gee, whiz, we didn't think he could hurt a fly, he seemed like such a good guy. He seemed like he didn't have a mean bone in his body...."

JUST A COUPLE of real recent examples:

~ We heard such accolades about the murderer of Yeardley Love, the beautiful lacrosse player from the University of Virginia that was recently murdered. "...Yeah, he drank a little, but he was such a nice guy. He wouldn't hurt a flea...."

~ We heard such accolades the other day about the 40 year-old African-American teacher in Texas who was caught on tape severely beating up a 13 year-old male student for making fun of a classmate. She has, of course, tearfully and quickly apologized for "her mistake." Well, normal people simply don't go around making such vile mistakes! Our point is: She is a teacher that "...has received two 'Teacher of the Year' awards... she couldn't hurt a flea... she doesn't have a mean bone in her body...."

Besides, "I made a mistake," being this Texas teacher's defense, she also contended that, "There's plenty of blame to go around." This response to her pugilism is laughable. What are we? Morons? Hm-hm, we understand. We get the picture. Well, at least she got fired!!!

Another teacher witnessed the violent episode but did not report it - She resigned!!!

("Watching The Watchers" is much too generous!) We respect these two women and their bosses, at least, for that - albeit we know they didn't have much of a choice. ABC, we implore you, employ the same discipline and honor with your employees in your ivory tower. DO UNTO THEM AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO TO THE AVERAGE CITIZEN!

~ We heard accolades about the religious zealot Dr. George A. Rekers, Ph.D., who recently resigned from his "prestigious-in-religious-circles" post at the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). George got caught on a long vacation with a male prostitute; George said he paid the prostitute to give him a massage every day.... And, um, uh, to carry George's suitcases. Don't hotels and airports have people who do that for you? Just askin' 

That's what Hasselbeck should do, she should resign. If she had any shame, or scruples, or integrity, she would step down from her position as co-host of "The View." What audacity it must take to think that she should just be forgiven by millions of victims of sex crimes just like that! Poof! Because, she's who!? Irreplaceable? Such a good role model?

GLARING OBSERVATION #2: "The man doth protest too much, me thinks, George!" is our response and reaction to Rekers' sexuality. (Please see: Notes) He is accused of being gay which he vehemently denies! He is promulgating violently that he is not gay! That's pretty insulting to gays! So what if you are gay, George! Oh, we get the picture! Wouldn't look good. You would be somewhat of a hypocrite then. We haven't read NARTH's website but, judging by the title, we can only surmise that NARTH is attempting to cure homosexuality. Gotch ya!  Who would have made up such an industry within our capitalism - curing gay people? Picture us shaking our heads - we commend you for your "creativity" and "ingenuity." Not.

Adorable 28 year-old county-n-western singer, Chely Wright, was a guest on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" on May 19, 2010. Chely revealed that, up until two weeks ago, she objected vehemently, brashly, loudly, perhaps even abusively, whenever she heard of another's homosexuality, so people wouldn't suspect her of lesbianism. We all get that picture! Since her childhood she knew that she is a lesbian and last year she put a gun in her mouth because she could no longer take the lying, the years of the layering of shame, guilt, fear.... She's the 1st country-n-western singer to come out of the gay closet; she had to do it for her literal, physical, survival and she felt it her duty to others since she is in that position of power that we're speaking of in this blog. Only two singers reached out to Chely since she came out, and there is always the chance that her fessing up to being a lesbian will ruin her career. If you are in the closet, George, perhaps you better stay there?  

GLARING OBSERVATION #3: Why is there a whole website and whole ASSOCIATION dedicated to the research and therapy of homosexuality? What an insult to gays! There are no homosexual associations researching and investigating heterosexuals. There are no associations attempting to change and cure people with blue eyes. These religious zealots make homosexuality sound like a disease that requires research and therapy, curing and changing.

How do we figure that the manner in which our neighbors use their sexual organs is our business? God commanded that we not covet anything belonging to our neighbor and that we treat our neighbor as ourselves; nowhere have we seen that God said to dip in your neighbors' personal and private bedroom activities. What audacity it must take to, like a parent, try and make your adult neighbors live their lives the way you think they should live and love Life!? What audacity it must take to think that God loves you best!?

EXAMPLE: We love our friends. Don't we? Some we love alot! Gore Vidal is an American author, playright, essayist, screenwriter, and political activist. Early in his career, he wrote "The City and The Pillar (1948) which outraged mainstream critics as one of the 1st major American novels to feature unambiguous sexuality. He had relationships with men and women. Gore and his male partner (deceased since 2005) had been together since 1950 and will be buried together. Gore said recently on "The Joy Behar Show" (HLN) that he and his long-time male partner had never engaged in the sex act with each other. Some people are asexual. Some people have an aversion to sex. The audacity it must take to expect an incestual explanation of the bedroom activities of these men, for instance. 

Why don't the boldly brazen and arrogant religious zealots, like George, go and live in Iran? President Ahmadinejad says there are no homosexuals in his country! Scared, George?

We could rest out case right here, but please bear with us. Let us not sway from Elsabeth Hasselbeck.

We think that the other co-hosts of "The View" went, "Gulp!" when Elisabeth directed the crude remarks to the predator that stalked Erin. Don't you? Quite frankly, we don't know how Elisabeth Hasselbeck showed her face the next day on "The View." The bright-eyed and bush-tailed manner in which she just casually sauntered onto the set of "The View" the day after making the venomous remarks about victims of sex crimes was just as insulting as her remarks about victims, if not more insulting!

Judging by her vivacity after the slap in the face (a euphemism to millions of victims and their families and friends), it looks like Elisabeth has just picked herself up, brushed herself off, and is back into reveling on "The View." It just doesn't feel right, ABC! We understand that "a sinner in her Catholicism is given a penance," by another human being (a priest) who could easily be a pervert or pedophile. The sinner is given a punishment of sorts, like, "Say 5 Our Fathers and 10 Hail Marys, my child, and go on your merry way." (Please see: Notes) Reminds us of the self-flagellation that early Catholics practiced which was aptly depicted in the movie, "The DaVinci Code." In our opinion, self-flagellation is sexual in nature, as we know domestic violence has that sexual component for the abuser. (The batterer is a sexual pervert! We bet you didn't know that.) Religious zealots of the past were some real sick puppies. We're wondering what the penance is for murder? The recitation of the rosary? 

Since Elisabeth the Elitist is a public figure, ABC, shouldn't her penance be public, also? We want to know that she won't sin, again, by abusing victims of sex crimes. We know that within Catholicism even thinking "bad thoughts" is a sin. Certainly, uttering our bad thoughts must be a bigger sin? Or has that changed? Get her off the air! WE DON'T RESPECT HER! It doesn't seem right that she should be flaunting her ecstacy on "The View" while victims remember how they were slapped by her. She should have been in tears.

GLARING OBSERVATION #4: Well, uh, oh, that's right, she was in tears. Wasn't she? The ole' tears trick! Elisabeth's handlers are not so dumb; we're sure that they knew right away that she goofed (sinned). Elisabeth's quick and teary apology the next day was meant to pejoratively, condescendingly, remind us, "We all say stupid things," but we think that Elisabeth did more than make a stupid remark. Her sewerlike humor and beliefs and her cruel expression of them on daytime television was only exceeded by her elitist and arrogant attempt to whitewash her hurtful wisecracks with a couple-second teary apology and imbecilic anecdote about her daughter questioning Elisabeth, "Why is Mommy sad?" This is an insult to the intelligence of a devoted and intelligent public who faithfully watch "The View." (We warn you, Elisabeth has quite an imagination.)

The answer to "Why is Mommy sad?" was "Mommy hurt somebody." We think this anecdote is pure fabrication. After all, Elisabeth has shown that she has quite a prolific, albeit, gutterlike imagination. We all recognize a slippery bullshit artist when we hear one. (Forgive us, it IS in the dictionary.) Well, yeah, we'd all be REAL sad, too, if hundreds of thousands of dollars was at stake - her paycheck. We'd be upset if our reputations were at stake, too.

"I listened," was Erin's skillful and kind evasion of Larry King's question (Please see: Notes) the other day when he asked if she forgave Elisabeth after the weepy apology, "... making light of a convicted felon is not funny!" In a different venue, Erin summed up Elisabeth's "joke" with, "It is a slap in the face to victims across the globe." So we ask you, ABC, if the victim is not forgiving so fast, why should the rest of the world!? So, Elisabeth could get a good salary? She's not so special at all. Plenty of better people than Hasselbeck waiting in the wings for her job! It's pretty pitiful, ABC, if that's the best you got! We know some pretty savvy and empathic individuals who would gladly volunteer.

GLARING OBSERVATION #5: It all reeks of common evilness! We wouldn't make such a big production about Ms. Hasselbeck's imbecility but when the religious right, our illustrious Republican friends, Conservatives... purport themselves/ourselves to be SO, how shall we say - RELIGIOUS - CHRISTIAN - prim and proper, so RIGHT (pardon the pun), we simply feel obliged to call them on it! There is nothing we reject more than hypocrisy! We know that God loves them best! They have a particular closeness to God that the rest of us don't have. If the religious right was just a little more humble (as their Christianity/Catholicism commands them to be), we wouldn't make nearly as big a production. We just simply don't think that Jesus meant for His religion to get as imbecilic as it has gotten! You'll certainly agree? For instance, look at all the pedophile-priests and dishonorable bishops that "...wouldn't hurt a flea, they're so nice... holy even...."

GLARING OBSERVATION #6: And, please, don't give us the schtick about, "We are all sinners." That's one of "their" favorites.  Yes, most of us are; but, most of us are not AS sinful! In point of fact, many of us are not sinful. We emphatically reject that brainwashing, indoctrination, "We are all sinners!" Let us not get sidetracked; that's a whole disparate dissertation. 

GLARING OBSERVATION #7: Does there seem to be more flagrant sinners amongst the religious zealots who flaunt their religiosity? Just askin'

Every time victims and their loved ones - prolific and numerous consumers - will see Erin Andrews at a fun sports event, we're always going to remember the slap in the face - and we don't want to be reminded! We want Elisabeth fired! Then we'll know we got justice! Treat Elisabeth like you (society) treat and have treated other women! Paste a  !@#%  scarlet letter on her bosom! WE WANT JUSTICE! (This is Nancy Grace's motto. Please see: Notes)

As we have stated, all of us make mistakes and most of us say stupid remarks but, in our wildest dreams, or our wildest imbecility and stupidity, would we have dreamed of saying, especially, to a victim of a horrendously scary sexual crime, "You asked for it," or "It's your fault," or "You keep dressin' like that and you're liable to bring it on, again." Nor would we imply that victims are responsible for their own victimization. Nor would we make jokes about it. The idea of there being a correlation, or a funny correlation, between Erin's clothing and stalking is perverted. But, then, that's us. Perhaps, we're not religious enough? Or RIGHT, enough? (Pardon the pun.)

GLARING OBSERVATION #8: We're wondering why the beautiful female dancers on "Dancing With The Stars" flaunt their scantily-clad physiques while fully-clothed male dancers flaunt THEIR wares in $2000 debonair, custom-made, silk suits and expensive shirts and ties? The lopsided exposition seems somewhat outta' whack - a caricature or cartoon or animation of "the custom-made suit dancing with an object, a naked blowup doll, dripping from just having showered" comes to mind. Why allow this double standard, ladies? It doesn't seem right. We're just askin' Above our paygrade is IMAGINING ONE OF THOSE FOOTBALL PLAYERS, NEARLY-NAKED, PRANCING TO THE STEPS OF A CHA-CHA... and his partner fully clothed. They'd look pretty silly! And VULNERABLE! Laughable! Perverted! Yet, you have made this the norm, "Dancing With The Stars." How about if we don't watch you anymore, either? Or, buy the products that you advertise? How would you like that? Yes, plenty of women out there buy your products!

Actually, we admire the beautiful costumes of the women very much. We just find most of our societal mores and societal quirks, societal norms - how shall we say - i n t e r e s t i n g ? We don't have the answers. We're just askin'

GLARING OBSERVATION #9: This observation really irks us! We'd like to slip it in right here; it fits in because Elisabeth is a parent of 4 children. And because it's always on our minds, in general. Hasselbeck has shown us that she is cheap and common. ("The View" is not meant to be on-the-job honing, training, in integrity.) Besides our not respecting people who hide behind religion, we also notice, in our society, that all one needs to do is have kids [either naturally by birth or unnaturally by adoption (Please see: Notes)and HE, OR SHE, GAINS MUCHO RESPECT - RESPECTABILITY, no matter what kind of jerk he, or she, is! Childless individuals? - NOT SO MUCH!

GLARING OBSERVATION #10: The religious right is quick to preach, "Forgive." Well! We just don't feel like it! We're always forgiving and you, all, are always offending! Why is that?

GLARING OBSERVATION #11: What's up with our Irish friends? Let us preface this by saying that there is good and bad in all races, ethnicities... and we pretty much like Bill O'Reilly of Fox News alot. BUT? For instance, does it seem like the talk-show circuit - especially the hate airwaves - is/are dominated by vitriolic, Irish-American, Catholic, talk-show hosts whose only job is to make money by polarizing our society? They spread hate - they separate us - and make big bucks doing it! And, German-Americans, too? Just askin'

While Barbara Walters (Please see: Notes) of "The View" is recovering from heart valve surgery, the "Ladies of The View" each day have a "guy-friend" as a co-host. On May 19, 2010, the guy-friend was Andre Leon Talley, former editor-at-large and current Contributing Editor for "Vogue" magazine. The topic of the day was Jonathan Rhys Meyers, an Irish actor and model. Evidently, during an airline flight, a drunken Meyers said the n-word. Meyers quickly went into alcohol rehab! 

The African-American Talley stated quickly and adamantly, "MEYERS SHOULD LOSE HIS GIG!" and ALL "THE LADIES OF THE VIEW" LOUDLY & DOGGEDLY AGREED that Meyers should lose his job! We're curious what was Elisabeth thinking at the time? 

Well, ladies, what exactly do you take us for? Idiots? We haven't forgotten! Just days ago, you accepted Hasselbeck's vitriol without any consequences! Follow your own advice: ELISABETH SHOULD LOSE HER GIG! You said it! Being victims of sex crimes is slightly more traumatic than hearing the n-word. Wouldn't you say? So, you see, this whole blog post, "Get The Bitch Off The !@#$% Air, ABC!" is not so farfetched. You agree with us! Elisabeth should be fired!

Stand up, survivors! And loved ones! (That means most of us.) Be heard! Don't just sit there and reward your oppressors (the advertisers...)! You have power! Don't buy the products until ABC gets rid of Elisabeth! These people work for you! Take more of your power back! Adopt Maya Angelou's super motto as your own: WHEN SOMEONE SHOWS YOU WHO THEY ARE, BELIEVE THEM THE 1ST TIME!

SUMMARY: As we have stated, we would not make such a big stink about this whole gallimaufry but how much hypocrisy anent religion can we take? A friend of "Watching The Watchers" told us of her innocent attempt at avoiding potential offensive breath in high school by chewing gum for which she received one detention. She describes herself as "having been 'a good kid,'" who served the detention-punishment the following Saturday at which time she walked alongside a huge and towering, spooky, nun who arrogantly quipped, "Ahhhhh, yes, God even gets the worst of you!" Whaaat!? This young child truly couldn't have hurt a flea yet she was spoken to as one would address a convicted murderer in a courtroom. All children want is approval and mentoring. This Catholic nun should have been fired!

We say the same thing to the aforementioned deviants, you know who you are, Elisabeth, George..., "God even gets the wort of YOU!" We observe so often the UNINTENDED manner in which the righteous and religious reveal their true selves, inevitably and unintentionally. THERE IS JUSTICE! Eventually! Survivors, just sit back and relax and watch the destruction! We're confident, quite confident, in fact, that the "worst of you" will show your true selves eventually! It is simply the way Life works!

Lastly - GLARING OBSERVATION #12: The relationship between the television viewer, the television audience, and ABC and its advertisers is not a relationship of, let's say, a couple of friends, or a married couple, who are encouraged by their religions and societal aphorisms to "forgive quickly." It's not quite so simple. We don't think God said, "Forgive your television networks, producers, and affiliates quickly... for 'they know not what they do.'" Where is your company's social responsibility, ABC!? Hasselbeck is in a position of power and prominence. The ladies of "The View" are looked up to - role models. They are influential whether they want to be or not. Females want to emulate them. There is a tradeoff for the privilege of entertaining us and being our role models AND getting paid the big bucks! WE ARE YOUR BOSSES! We will no longer allow prominent marital-cheaters, whoremongers, financial crooks, prostitute-buyers, womanizers, pedophiles, so-called misspeakers, and verbal abusers... to "make mistakes," "say stupid things," and cry "forgive me as I flee to rehab," while they get rich off of us! There are plenty of talented, decent people waiting in the wings for the privilege of entertaining us. Let us not forgive so quickly! There must be consequences for these privileged like there are consequences for children and average adult citizens. Let's start by weeding out our poor role models. And, we promise you - This world will be a better place!

Well, we misspoke (The verb, misspoke, is the current apology for "mistakes" amongst the elite.). 

We do have another espial that we'd like to share with the bloggers of the world (THANK YOU for your patience!): 

On his last "The Celebrity Apprentice," (Please see: Notes) Donald Trump asked one of the participants, Maria Kanellis, former "Wild World of Wrestling" diva, singer, songwriter, model, and actress, "Why don't you like Curtis Stone?" (Stone is an Australian celebrity chef and a current participant in the show?) Trump asked and Maria answered honestly, "I don't like uncouth Curtis because he rudely came into our room, evacuated his bowels, and left his horrific stench!" Aren't there enough other bathrooms in Trump Towers? (Please see: Notes) 

Maria was then punished for her honesty! "This is my office, not a locker room!" Trump scolded Maria for being honest and for not protecting her abuser, her disrespecter.  Do you like "disrespecter" better? Then Trump fired her! We're confused. Didn't Trump want an honest answer? We don't think people should be fired for their honesty! Another participant of the same show, Sharon Osbourne, music manager, promoter, author, television personality, and wife of rocker Ozzy Osbourne, said that she, too, detests the Australian chef. For the same reason? Would she, also, have been fired if she had spoken up honestly?

We commend and thank Maria Kanellis profusely for having the courage to tell THAT truth! We were dying! (to know why two savvy, powerful, women like Maria and Sharon disliked the Australian chef so much) Yessss! Victims ~ & survivors ~ are not going to cover for our abusers anymore! Victims aren't gonna' protect the rude, inconsiderate, offensive disrespecters and bullies NO MORE! (grammar: yep, we are aware of the double negative in our previous sentence.)

The American Grammy Award-winning singer-songwriter and Emmy Award-winning actress, Cindy Lauper, another celebrity on "The Celebrity Apprentice" at the same time, was also fired for being too honest during an episode. Ivanka, Donald, and Trump's oldest son questioned why she was so honest in business. Huh!?  

Why should we expect any less from ABC? We implore you, ABC, "The View" is not a locker room! What's good for "The Donald" (Please see: Notes) is good for "The View." 

How many different ways must we say it, ABC!? "The View"- ers have been violated! In the words of The Donald, tell Elisabeth, "You're fired!!!" (Trump said he is attempting to get the phrase "You're fired" copywrited. Doesn't he mean "trademarked?" Just askin')


Summary of our current 12 "GLARING OBSERVATIONS":
  • #1 Elisabeth Hasselbeck couldn't hurt a fly or a flea?
  • #2 Me thinks George Rekers protests too much about not being gay?
  • #3 The natural differences of people like, homosexuality, blue eyes ....
  • #4 A handy defense: We all say stupid things? Not that stupid, though.
  • #5 Do Christians arrogantly purport themselves to be "The Chosen Ones"
  • #6 A handy defense: We are all sinners?
  • #7 Does it seem like there are more flagrant sinners amongst the religious right?
  • #8 Female vs male nudity in our society
  • #9 Just have kids & you'll get respect no matter what kind of jerk you are!
  • #10 Forgive quickly? We don't think so!
  • #11 Do Irish-American Catholics dominate the hate airwaves?
  • #12 What is a company's social responsibility?


notes:

We supercolossally and profusely apologize, and humbly request your forgiveness, for the language in the title of this entry BUT we had to get your prompt attention due to the importance and urgency of our cause! We firmly believe that "our cause" outweighs "the vulgarity." Although the term, bitch, merely means "a female dog," it has a nasty connotation in the United States. THANK YOU for understanding

Actually, we think FEMALE DOGS SHOULD BE INSULTED for the nasty connotation that the United States has given THEM! Is this another product of our illustrious patriarchal past? Thanks idiotic patriarchs!

* ABC is the abbreviation for the American Broadcasting Company. It is an American television network created in 1943 and owned by the Walt Disney Company.

The term, unnatural, means "not provided by God or nature."

* "The View" is an American talk show co-created and co-produced by Barbara Walters which debuted in 1997 and has had 10 co-hosts. Barbara Walters and Joy Behar are the only original co-hosts that are still on the program.

* "Dancing With The Stars" is a group of international television series that America copied from Great Britain.

* "The man doth protest too much, me thinks, is a quote from (Britain) William Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark," a romance tragedy composed between 1600 and the summer of 1602.

* Nancy Grace is an attorney with her own crime talk show on HLN television station and the motto of her show is, "We want justice!" HLN, formerly known as CNN Headline News and CNN2 is a cable television news channel based in the United states. It is a spinoff of the original cable news channel, CNN, which we adore. (Please keep in mind that we've been, metaphorically, kicked in the teeth so often right after we compliment that we hesitate to compliment.)

* Larry King is the host of his eponymous nightly American talk show, "Larry King Live" on CNN which debuted in 1985. (In 2010, the show will celebrate its 25th anniversary.)

ESPN is the trademark for Entertainment Sports Network, an American cable television channel.

* "Our Father" and "Hail Mary" are Catholic prayers.

* The 12 "GLARING OBSERVATIONS" are, by no means, ALL of our observations. (But how much can we ask you to read in one sitting? Thank you so much for reading!) These observations are simply the ones that have currently jumped out at us; these types of injustices can hardly be avoided or ignored but they are ignored when people are so busy living their lives - just trying to survive. We understand and don't blame people for living busy lives. These observations shouted out to us and we feel obligated to broadcast them in our attempt to repair the world. We'll Watch The Watchers for you since we know you're busy!

"The Celebrity Apprentice" is a reality television series about entrepreneurship created by billionaire Donald Trump.

* "Trump Towers" is a skyscraper/building in New York City owned by Donald Trump.

* "The Donald" is the endearing nickname that people have given billionaire Donald Trump.


conclusion:

ABC, we expect you'll act quickly - graciously & empathically - to step up your social responsibility as a company and say to us and to your public, "Well, since you put it that way...."

Bill Cosby speaks...

Here are some observations from our beloved and respected actor, comedian, Dr. William Henry "Bill" Cosby, Jr., Ed.D., about his people.

         
It's Not About Race, But Behavior!


"... They're standing on the corner and they can't speak English. I can't even talk the way these people talk: 'Why you ain't? Where you is? What he drive? Where he stay? Where he work? Who you be?...'

And I blamed the kid until I heard the mother talk. And then I heard the father talk.

Everybody knows it's important to speak English except these knuckleheads. You can't be a doctor with that kind of crap coming out of your mouth. In fact, you will never get any kind of job making a decent living. People marched and were hit in the face with rocks to get an education, and now we've got these knuckleheads walking around.

The lower economic people are not holding up their end in this deal. These people are not parenting. They are buying things for kids - $500 sneakers! For what!? And they won't spend $200 for Hooked On Phonics.

I am talking about these people who cry when their son is standing there in an orange suit. Where were you when he was 2? Where were you when he was 12? Where were you when he was 18 and how come you didn't know that he had a pistol? And where is the father? Or who is his father?

People putting their clothes on backward: Isn't that a sign of something gone wrong? People with their hats on backward, pants down around the crack, isn't that a sign of something? Or are you waiting for Jesus to pull his pants up? Isn't it a sign of something when she has her dress all the way up and got all type of needles (piercing) going through her body?

What part of Africa did this come from? We are not Africans. Those people are not Africans; they don't know a thing about Africa with names like Shaniqua, Taliqua, and Mohammed and all of that crap, and all of them are in jail.

'Brown (or black) versus the Board of Education' is no longer the White person's problem. We have got to take the neighborhood back.

People used to be ashamed. Today a woman has eight children with eight different 'husbands' or men or whatever you call them now.

We have millionaire football players who cannot read. We have million-dollar basketball players who can't write two paragraphs. We, as Black folks, have to do a better job. Someone working at Wal-Mart with seven kids, you are hurting us.

We have to start holding each other to a higher standard. We cannot blame the White people any longer...."


Hispanic

We were mocked  and harrassed for using the words, Hispanic and Spain, in the same breath in the September 2, 2009, entry entitled, "Makes Me Wonder What Else They're Not Telling Me?" although, it looks now like the author of that critique has deleted his comment. 

The scolder wrote that:  
Hispanic has nothing to do with Spain!  

{
We're curious.  We're wondering:  "What's up with all the anger and hate and hostility!?" }



Usage Note from Dictionary.com
:

Though often used interchangeably in American English, Hispanic and Latino are not identical terms, and in certain contexts the choice between them can be significant.

Hispanic, from the Latin word for "Spain," has the broader reference, potentially encompassing all Spanish-speaking peoples in both hemispheres and emphasizing the common denominator of language among communities that sometimes have little else in common.

Latino
— which in Spanish means "Latin" but which as an English word is probably a shortening of the Spanish word latinoamericano — refers more exclusively to persons or communities of Latin American origin.

Of the two, only Hispanic can be used in referring to Spain and its history and culture; a native of Spain residing in the United States is a Hispanic, not a Latino, and one cannot substitute Latino in the phrase the Hispanic influence on native Mexican cultures without garbling the meaning.

In practice, however, this distinction is of little significance when referring to residents of the United States, most of whom are of Latin American origin and can theoretically be called by either word. 


A more important distinction concerns the sociopolitical rift that has opened between Latino and Hispanic in American usage:
  • For a certain segment of the Spanish-speaking population, Latino is a term of ethnic pride and Hispanic a label that borders on the offensive.  According to this view, Hispanic lacks the authenticity and cultural resonance of Latino, with its Spanish sound and its ability to show the feminine form Latina when used of women.
  • Furthermore, Hispanic — the term used by the U.S. Census Bureau and other government agencies — is said to bear the stamp of an Anglo establishment far removed from the concerns of the Spanish-speaking community.
While these views are strongly held by some, they are by no means universal, and the division in usage seems as related to geography as it is to politics, with Latino widely preferred in California and Hispanic the more usual term in Florida and Texas. Even in these regions, however, usage is often mixed, and it is not uncommon to find both terms used by the same writer or speaker.

~  Chicano is probably influenced by the Spanish word, "chico," meaning "boy," also used as a nickname.  The adjective is first attested in 1967. 

It is used only of Mexican Americans, not of Mexicans living in Mexico. It was originally an informal term in English (as in Spanish), and the spelling of the first recorded instance in an American publication followed the Spanish custom of lowercasing nouns of national or ethnic origin. 


However, the literary and political movements of the 1960s and 1970s among Mexican Americans established Chicano as a term of ethnic pride, and it is properly written today with a capital. 

While Chicano is a term of pride for many Mexican Americans, it remains a word with strong political associations. Since these politics are not necessarily espoused by all Mexican Americans, and since usage and acceptance of this word can vary from one region to another, an outsider who is unfamiliar with his or her audience may do well to use Mexican American instead.

Was There a Jewish President?

We have not been able to verify this, but thought it interesting never the less:

On the February, 12, 1809, nearly 200 years ago, a young, poor, illiterate woman from Virginia, Nancy Hanks Lincoln, gave birth to a son in a log cabin built along the banks of the south fork of Nolin Creek near what is now Hodgenville, Kentucky. That baby, who she named Abraham, grew to become one of our greatest and most tragic national leaders.

Abraham Lincoln was a man of great spiritual conviction, yet, and I find this fact fascinatingly instructive, he was the only American President not to have declared himself a member of any particular religious faith. That fact has given rise to a great deal of interesting speculation. In fact, there are those who believe that Honest Abe was Jewish.

After all, his name was Abraham. His great-grandfather was named Mordechai. Lincoln was the only President not to have a formal religious affiliation. He was neither raised in a church nor did he ever belong to a church.

And there's more... the town of Lincoln, in eastern England, from where his ancestors came, has an interesting Jewish history. A Jewish community was established there in 1159.

During Crusader riots, the Sheriff of Lincoln saved the Jews by giving them official protection. St. Hugh, the great Bishop of Lincoln, taught love of Jews to his parishioners. His death was marked by an official period of mourning among Lincoln's Jews.

Rabbi Joseph of Lincoln was a scholar mentioned in the Talmud; Aaron of Lincoln was a financier whose operations extended all over the country. In 1255, Lincoln's Jews were accused of ritual murder. Ninety-one Lincoln Jews were sent to London for trial and 18 were executed. Notwithstanding, the Lincoln Jewish community flourished until 1290 when they were forcibly expelled by edict.

Most Jewish historians assume that all the Jews of Lincoln left in 1290. But could it be possible that some remained, practicing their Judaism in secret... passing the family secret from generation to generation? The more we learn of the secret life of Spanish Jewry following the Expulsion of 1492, the more we must at least consider the possibility of the same thing occurring elsewhere.

When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, whole Jewish communities sat shivah. Rabbis all over the country eulogized the fallen President. Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, the man who created Reform Judaism in this country, began his eulogy with the words, "Brethren, the lamented Abraham Lincoln believed himself to be bore from our bone and flesh from our flesh. He supposed himself to be a descendant of Hebrew parentage. He said so in my presence."

Lincoln was often questioned about his religious beliefs. Time and again, he told of a special passage from Scripture that summed up his theology. It was the 20th chapter of the book of Exodus he recommended that every American study, learn, and follow. In English it is usually referred to as the Ten Commandments.

Rabbi Jeff Kahn
Temple Har Shalom, Warren, N.J.

Blood-dripping Stumps of Amputees in Wheelchairs

[ We're at our wit's end - some of the words in this entry simply refuse to get in line.  Thank you for overlooking these malfunctions.  Technology doesn't always cooperate.  Thank you very much for your patience! ]


 
Who!? would conspire  [a conspiracy]  to set up a secret web, an underground network, of "jails for single moms" throughout a free nation for the sole purpose of sequestering them  [like common criminals - away from the support and influence of family and friends]  and then taking their infants?  The reason for this cold isolation of vulnerable pregnant moms about to give birth was to more easily influence, program, brainwash them out of their babies.  [The 1st rule of brainwashing is "separate the victim from family and friends (mentally and/or physically)." Within the confines of this crude segregation, single moms  [and their families were threatened with ostracism from their society for daring to give birth while single.  When we heard of this, we were nonplussed to the hilt!  Astonished dumbfounds inquired, "Where does one go when ostracized from one's society?  To hell?  To the woods?  Of what century do you speak!?  What kind of a free nation would allow this?  What kind of small, cold and characterless, barbaric, moneygrubbing, perverted, Caucasian entrepreneurs and religious zealots would conspire to swindle families, tribes, out of their infants!?  Are you sure this occurred in our beloved United States of America?  Our Constitution says every citizen, single or married, has the right to parent his, or her, own child.  We're certain that coercion, duress, and undue influence in all other legal transactions and contracts are against the law!  Why were/are these illegal tactics ONLY allowed in adoptions!?  Come on!  You can tell us the truth.  Was that in the 1800s-1900s when fallen women were forced to wear 'the scarlet letter' on their breasts so the whole society could see who are the sinners?  Like people who get DWIs are forced to adorn their cars with special license plates today?"

{{{ Or, you could call them "reformatories" instead of "jails" if it makes you feel better.  In the dictionary, they're the same.  We checked.  The institutions had various names.  Some single moms were even put in psychiatric wards until they signed on the dotted line - saying it's ok to take their babies.  It's hard to believe this occurred in these here United States of America in the 20th century!  Perhaps it's not so hard to believe - we enslaved African Americans.  We stole land from Native Americans.  We forcibly interned innocent Japanese American families.  We sent our innocent young boys to get killed in our unjust war with Iraq under the guise of Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction.  [What did we tell the families of these young, innocent, dead boys!?  "Oops."]  Let's see?  What else can we be proud of? }}}


{{{ The UTTERLY baffling conundrum, and eternal question is, and shall remain, "How do a couple a' people take someone else's child when most civilized people wouldn't, and couldn't, take a goldfish from another!?  That is the question.  Where does this haughty ENTITLEMENT come from!?  What makes a couple a' people feel that they are ENTITLED to the child of another!?  THE CHILD!  Of another!?  Imagine!?  THE CHILD FROM THE SEMEN, THE BIRTH CANAL AND VAGINA, THE BODY, THE LINEAGE, OF ANOTHER!  Where do a couple a' people get THE AUDACITY to take the child of another!!!?  Who would take the resultant creation from the PERSONAL and PRIVATE sex act of another!?  It's incestuous!  It's sexual abuse!  It's perverted! Especially disquieting and shameful and criminal is taking a child from the vulnerable!?  Well, you ONLY can separate the vulnerable! }}}

[ The following is somewhat of a gallimaufry but then so is the patchwork described - you'll get the picture.  Caution, though, the patchwork is relatively as looooooong as the looooooong years! ]


  • The Ax of Separation Falls
  • An Assembly of Limbless Families
  • Hours Turn into Days, Months, Years, Decades...
  • A Coliseum of Colliding Wheelchairs
  • Innately Docile is Female Youth
  • A Cacophony of Betrayal
  • Remnants of a Lost Child


Blood-dripping Stumps of Amputees in Wheelchairs

What's left after adoption?


< a précis >


Hurry!  Come one, come all!
Take the offspring!
Right after birth is best
Before she changes her mind
While we still have her brainwashed
Groggy from anesthesia
Before she has time to think
Stick the adoption papers under her nose
Go over seas?  No intrusion
Naaaw, let's stay!
Let's just give her a dribble
We'll tell her she can have contact
We'll do a "gentleman's agreement"
We'll fool her!

We could always skip town without telling her
Law's on our side
The putrid stink of a wily plot
You ask how do we sleep at night?
Pretty damned well, thank you
Deserving adopters
There are no adjectives
Simply
Shame on you!

The  ax  of  separation  falls
Dripping, bloody, stumps
Like axed lumber
Big-eyed, blood-drained ashen faces of hoodwinked amputees
Furled brows asking,
Whyyyy?
Why did you make us limbless?
Because we are single?
Because we have no troglodytes?
Pardon?  Just an excuse to take the offspring?
You care less if we give birth single?
It was just your disguise... your trick
It was just a ploy?
The avenue by which to extricate the children?
It's big business
Family separation
You came in sheep's clothing
Why do you make us limbless, amputators?
Just for money?
What were you paid for our babies?
And what did you pay for a baby?

Limbless trunks cradled in snugly wheelchairs
Slippin' - n - slidin' in global lakes of tears
From gushing bug-eyed waterfalls
Stubs pushing wheels round-n-round-n-round...
Peddling with one foot
Some with one arm
Some no arms
No legs
Yes, blood-dripping stumps of amputees
Please!  Can you make the bleeding stop!?
Ceaseless, maddening, whirling circles of wheelchairs
No calm ever
Searching ground to sky...
East to west...
Grieving circlers...
On a hasty, desperate, wild-goose chase
Rhythmical bumping of steel against steel
Isochronal deafening silence
Sounds of something stealthily valuable goin' on
Oh-oh, one dares to speak

Where's my baby!?
Where have adoption titans failed?
Staccato clashing, crashing, wheels

I crave for sleep to come
Stay awake!
They took your baby!
How?
By way of intoxicating accouchement, silly!
Incessant rousing jerks and jolts
Like sparking dodgems in ghostly amusement parks

Look at me!
Hollow
Protruding stomach flat

What have you done!?
Empty amniotic sac
Shrieking, clanging, wheels

I want to cover my ears but have no arms
I'm limbless
Make it stop!
Good grief, you whining Pollyanna!
Stop your ridiculous, useless, search!
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Records of your birth are hidden from you

But reserved for who?
Where do they sit?
In Congress?
Ha ha ha ha ha...
They've left town with my baby!
Ha ha ha ha ha...
What happened!?
Quit your sniveling!
Where are OUR children!?  Not yours!
Nature says so!
Limbless, blood-dripping, moms lost together
Blood-drenched wheelchairs
Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip...
Hurry!  Push your wheels
Nowhere hurriedly
Yours!?  I don't know!  Where is mine!?
I was groggy!  And, now he's gone!
I was groggy!  And, you took my child!
Listen!
 
The EMPATHIC plaintive wails of wounded wolves
The nagging jangle of wheels on wheels
Compassionate yowls
Even wolves know it's not right to separate tribes, packs!
Couldn't do it to wolves!  No no no no no...
Wolves'll bite ya' back
Tear your head off
Try it!
Separate baby cub from Mama bear
Scaredy cat
Go ahead!
But watch your fingers!
Watch your fingers?
Watch your head!

Cut your body in half with one bite
Then you'll be limbless
Don't mess with Nature, baby!
Don't mess with God's creation!
Endless endeavor to heal the UNhealable wound
Amaranthine sadness
The waaaaiiiiting...

Will he look for us when he grows?
Not if adoption titans can help it!
Or adopters!
Adopters are the titans!!!
Fill the kids with incestuous guilt

Drowning
Hey, down there!
LOOK UP!

Wide-eyed, anorexic, bug-eyes peering
Sunlight flitting beyond the subterranean grief-filled well

But not for you!

The looooooong years..........

An  assembly  of  limbless  families
Blood-dripping stumps
Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip...
Please!  Can you make it stop!?
We'll do anything

Limbless grandmas, grandpas, in wheelchairs
Slippin-n-slidin in pools of blood
Limbless brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces, nephews...
Blood-drenched wheelchairs slippin-n-slidin
Black mourning hovers wall-less coliseums
Across the globe
Invisible walls envelope limbless tribes
They've left town with her baby
But... you promised I could see

He's no gentleman!
She's no lady!
You promised we could see
Why did you run?
Hey!!!

Callous, leaden, overcast days
Dark nights of fear
Is he ok!?
Is she ok!?

Titans left out hell would be so caliginous
Whole tribes of blood-dripping amputees
Stupefied mouths agape
Abyssal, yawning, wells of teardrops filling fast
Will we survive?
Cold amputators
Deserted, ostracized, betrayed, hearts bleeding
No calm ever
Searching ground to sky...
East to west...
In circles
Blood-dripping stumps in bumping wheelchairs
Like sparking dodgems of an empty amusement park
Some peddling one foot
Some one arm
Ancestral, tribal, amputees
Hard to imagine!
A tribe of limbless, bloody, amputees
Are you sure!?
What do we tell the siblings?
The relatives?
Why do we say we are limbless?
Why couldn't we hold on tight to family?
Like Sarah Palin
Why disperse us across the globe?
Why separate us!?
Whyyyy?

Ask bloody, limbless, amputees
What's left?
Disgraced tears cascade down well-carved contours
A corybantic cataract
Global society preys on susceptible, well-formed, bodies
Lurching... lurking...
Ambush young pregnant beauty
Here's our chance!
Survival of the Fittest
Darwin's wise theory of unabashed natural selection
He predicted vulnerable amputees
Peddling wheels round-n-round in lakes of tears
Overflowing lakes of blood
Flooding
Clanging, bumping, deafening steel against steel
Rigorous, vigorous and profuse
Hurryyy!
The empty well within
The empty arms without
Longing for sleep to come
Permanent?
Sounds almost good!
How do we reconcile within?
And without?

The loss of a child
The looooooog years..........

Hours turn into days, months, years, decades...
The forever CUT stays centuries
No bandaid for bleeding stumps
Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip...
Grief never ends
Oh no!  Believe you me!  Grief is not a slacker

At no time slackens
Does it subside at the sepulcher?
We don't know?
In the next life?

Waiting...
Yearning...
The soft and gentle touch of joyous infancy
Hmmmmm... feels sooooo gooood...
For adopters
Time heals all wounds
Who says so!?
Liars!
Passing in the street...
At a get-together...
Could that be him?
Are those his father's eyes?

Searching faces... features...
Could that be her?
Her nose looks like my nose
She looks like my mom
Oh, my God!
Is that my daughter!!!?

Scanning high...
Scouring low...
Was it her!?
I don't knoooow!

To the sky
And back to hell again
Lost... in leaden melancholy
Looking from well to flitting sunshine
Squinting
Sobbing
Bounteous and bloody gushing waterfalls
Ceaseless drops of water on foreheads of innocence
Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip...
Chinese water torture
Wasn't it meant only for war?
Why be at war with us!?

Easier to take your babies
Ha ha ha ha ha...

Say what!?
Insanity
Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip...
The drenching sadness
Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip...
Titanic teardrops
Flood the globe
Baby thieves will drown... die...
Like babies died
Black mourning
Inhumane
Nefarious
Villainous
Funereal
Ocean of death
The looooooog years..........

A coliseum of colliding wheelchairs

Robbed of spirit                                                       Limbless moms who lost the game
To sharks, con artists, flimflammers, downright thieves

No husbands
No troglodytes to protect expected amputees

We're comin' to getch ya'
Oh, pitiful unmarried breeder
You're a pitiful dumb Pollyanna
Don't be so easy!
You disgust us!
Ha ha ha ha ha...
You're too easy!

2010 - the Paleolithic Age?
We didn't know?
A jungle
Survival of the Fittest
Beautiful moms of Springtide
How dare they be so beautiful?
And single, too!?  We'll have none of it!
We're older, smarter, wiser, devious
We know what's valuable
Don't try to fight us
Yeaahhh, yoooou coooould say we're rapists?
We do rape and pillage villages                                                                                                                     Ravage bodies             
But you gave us an excuse                                                                                                                                       Ha ha ha ha ha                         
You got caught                                                                              
Ha ha ha ha ha

Nature gave you a gift
We have the evidence of your sin - a child
Illegitimate!  You have no right!  We say so!
Repent!  Oh, harlot!
Okay to be a slut...
BUT...
Don't be a single mom in the jungle
Pure ludicrousness
Don't give us an excuse to take your child!
Don't be so
kind - ha ha ha ha ha...
Young wide-eyed Pollyanna

Trade ya'
Doom!
Gloom!
For your child

Searching the skies...
Wide-eyed whirling
Exhaustive peddling of blood-drenched wheelchairs
Remember the stumps?
Oh, you've forgotten!  Convenient!
How could you!?
How do you sleep at night?

Pretty damned well, thank you!
You have no right!
We're married
We deserve a child
We followed the rules

Get away from us, vultures!
How to heal the UNhealable wound?
That is the question!
'Twas a filthy bastardized coercion
That's what it was!
Indeeeed!
WHO would take the child of another!?
What kind of person is he and she?
Right fresh from the birth canal
Someone else's cervix, vagina, and vulva!?
Someone else's semen!
Impinge on the ancestry of another!?
What kind of dinosaurs are you!?
And then act as if nothing volatile has happened?
That's strange!  Bizarre!
How do you do that!?
You steal!
What does the mirror say back?
Have you no scruples whatsoever?
Sheer COLD unabashed trickery
Brrrrrrr...
How do you sleep at night?

The putrid stink of a wily plot
Reeks of a familiar stench?
What's that smell?
Ooooh!  Hateful holocaust's brutal echoes
A Hitlerian aura about it... skull and bones... bug-eyed souls
A personal holocaust of single wide-eyed moms
How dare she be so comely?  And children, too!?
We'll have none of it!
She'll damned well wear that scarlet letter
If we have anything to say about it!  You betch ya'!

Adolph Hitler forced children from families, too
For his
Hitler Youth
Or, to to jail
Or, even be killed?
Once young, carefree, and joyous

Now anorexic and limbless and bug-eyed
After giving birth to a gift
Not for you!
Hey, Nature says so!
God OBVIOUSLY has spoken!
Don't rewrite history!
The Universe says so!
The deoxyribonucleic acid says so!
It is written!
What more proof do you need!
Don't eerily mess with Nature!
Don't follow Hitler's lead!
Follow Nature rule of law!

Peddling with one foot
Pushing with one arm
Some no arms...
Some no legs...
Awkward blood-dripping stubs steering bloody wheels
The looooooog years..........

Innately docile is female youth
Innocent
Good girls
YOUR so-called bad girls know what to do
Vulnerable
Brainwashed
Naive

OUR descendants IN OUR bodies
NOT YOURS!

Developing offspring
Hormones raging
Not for you, though!
Nature says so!
Oh, deserving adopters!  Not for you!
Self-proclaimed deserving adopters!
Who died and
left you boss?
Say what?  Share!?
What'd ya' think we are?  Baby machines!?
Come on, you could have more!
Perhaps not a 2nd time?
You're fertile, Myrtle!
What about secondary infertility?
Why are we explaining our sexual organs to you!?
You have no right to discuss my fertility!
You have no right in be in my fertility!
You have no right in my body!
What kind of pervert are you!?
You incestuous abuser!
Why are we explaining to you?
Who are you!?
Reeks of sexual abuse!

Get away from us, you vultures!
We've heard it all
Can't you see?
Our hands over our ears!
Go away!!!
Now, now, be selfless
Solve society's ills
Go on with your lives
Go to college
Take a few classes
It'll be fun
Keep busy
Get piddling jobs

But...
Raising our children IS our job!!!
The Universe has spoken!
Why are we explaining to you?
You have no right to our children!
The Universe has spoken!
YOUR God has spoken!
Don't think about our limbless bodies!?
Whaaat!?

Can we hear correctly!?
How dare you add insult to injury!?

Go on with your life
Whaaat?
How dare you add insult to injury!?
YOU go on with YOUR lives, amputators!!!

You can't fight us!
We're smarter!
We have more money!
We're organized!
Society's on our side!
In fact, we ARE society!
Don't think about it!

How do we accomplish that formidable feat!?
You did the right thing
Then...
Why does it hurt so much?                                                                                                                                    Well, we're afraid that's simply your problem                                                                                                  
Even greenness knows it's not right
The empathic plaintive wail of distant wolves so near
Immoral
Be glad
Unethical
You'll be fine
Trust us!  We're your neighborly flimflammers
eh...
We mean...  We're your friends!
We want what's best for you!
College is for you

Oh, that's priceless!
Come on, hand him over!
Hand over the goods!
Besides...
There' a market
Come on!
Let's look alive
There's money to be made
There's a demand
You supply!

We demand!
Your illegitimate bastard is the product
We say so!
Wake up! 
Oh, beautiful Springtide!  The Universe cries with you!
Move over!
There's billions to be made!
Haven't you heard of "supply and demand"
Economics 101
We've done it so long this way

Don't fight us!
Reeks of slavery!?
Don't be silly
It's been done for years
It's our right!

Be grateful!

The looooooog years..........

A cacophony of betrayal!

It's man's doing!
The Universe didn't acquiese...
to the worse-than-wicked slaughterous enslavement of man
to the worse-than-wicked Nazi Holocaust
to worse-than-wicked terrorism
to the worse-than-wicked bamboozle of single moms
to the wall-less amphitheater of whirling blood-dripping amputees
in wheelchairs
It's all man's evil doing!
And woman's
Slippin' n slidin' in the lakes of combusting teardrops
Yeeeah!  Combusting!
Watch your backs!
Yep, that's a threat! 

Combusting punishment!
May fall from the sky?
From heaven?
From hell?
Ooooooohhh...
And bite ya'
You fooled with Mother Nature!
With God's creation
Blood-dripping stumps
Can? Can, ya' hear the drip? drip? drip? drip? drip?
In your sleep?
The rich drone of deafening despair
The rich staccato clashing wheels searching
Rich, yesss...
Rich with lonely longing
The soft and gentle loving touch of unforgotten infancy
Casual, loving, touch of missed adolescence
The hearty touch of missed adulthood
Wounded puppies
Trembling
Whimpering in harmony
A bug-eyed limbo of empty souls
That
YOU
created
Not God!
God has spoken!
Through DNA
YOUR fine-tuned orchestration
Your orchestra of sorrow
Can ya' hear it in your sleep?
Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip...
Not much left to chance
Not Survival of the Fittest
But Survival of the Coldest!
Most Treacherous!
Vermin-laden plot of carnivorous adoption titans
Unashamed amputators leave blood-dripping stumps
And never look back once
How cold must they be?
Think they have the right
Callous disregard
Didn't even try to bandage bloody open gushing stab
Watch your backs!
Life-sucking, slurping, chin-dripping laughing leeches
Ha ha ha ha ha...
You can't hurt us!  Society's on our side!
We are society!

Sucking life out of groggy Mommies of Springtide
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Confused and dazed with hospital intoxicants
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Slurping babies from groggy bodies
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Crafty deception...
Ha ha ha ha ha... 
Trickery of the highest order
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Why adopters?
You know what it's like to be childless!?
You know childless desperation!?
You know your heartache well!?
Why do you foist it upon us!!!?

Whhyyyy!

What have we done so bad to you!?
How could you steal ancestry right from our wombs!?
Have you NO shame!?
How do you do that!?
We're stymied!!!

We couldn't do it to you
Why not spend as much helping moms & children?
Not that philanthropic?
At all!  Huh?
No way, baby!
Why not expend as much energy uniting as separating?
No way!  Huh?                                                                                                                                                           Not that selfless?                                                                                                                                                      Like you want us to be?                                                                                                                                            Say what?                                                                                                                           

You say selfless is for fools?                                                                       
Eh, selfless is specially for single moms

Gotch  ya'                                                                                                                               
                                            Is that what you celebrate!?  Gotch ya' Day!?
That's what you call it?                                                                                                                                            You say a mouthful, you know                                                
Have you no shame whatsoever!?                                                     
You add more insult to more injury!
You crush!  You're crushers!
You crush more salt in our wounds!
You put your foot on necks' backs and crush
Why adopters!?                                                      
Do divulge more
Why not take in both?  Mom & child?
No way that selfless?
Say what?
Wanna' get paid for your trouble?
Want something to show for your trouble?
That's understandable
Uh?  We think?
Better to give than to receive, oh, christians?
But not for you!  Huh?
Because you're who!?
Rather manipulate Nature?  Huh?
Tamper with God's creation?  Huh
?
We caaaan't heeeear you!

Create limbless tribes?
Torn lineages?

PLEASE don't say! "It's God's plan"
PLEASE don't utter hackneyed insults! "There's a reason"
DON'T TAKE OUR BABIES!  AND INSULT US, TOO!
Don't lie!
Have SOME scruples!
How do you sleep at evil night?
Just askin'

Well conceived family separations by expert machinators
Yep!  If you can't conceive offspring?
Conceive machinations
Now, there's a pastime for ya'
Begets ya' the same results
For now
Conceive children
Or, machinations
Conception vs machination
No more!
No more supply!
No more demands on us, fools!
Now you're the fools!

Social media
Watch your back!

You didn't care about us
Didn't even give us a 2nd thought all these years
of having our children that God gave TO US

Now we don't care about you!
Moms, fight hard the random evil
Beware!  Pregnant Springtide
No doubt about it - adoptions are well-machinated
Well-planned
Victims are random
The hunt is on!
What's left after adoption!?
Blood dripping stumps of amputees in wheelchairs!!!
Limbless moms!!!
Bodies of no use but breeding for others
Buried alive
Are heads still protruding!?
Hurry, adoption adorers, more dirt!
What's left?
Live graves!

REMNANTS OF A LOST CHILD....

[ Sweet Dreams ]

Hey! Watch Your #$%* Language, Dr. Phil!

What ever happened to all those secret "jails for unwed mothers!?"  Business was slow?  Aaaawww Forced to close?  Aaaawww!  What're ya' doin' for money these days?  Just curious....

    There are quite a few particulars worth noting about Dr. Phil's December 11, 2009, show but many of them allude us after the fact.  We regret not having taken notes.  We didn't because we erroneously reckoned, "We've come a long way, baby!" with respect to the public's knowledge of adoption.  Dr. Phil proved us VERY wrong!


    Phil McGraw is still impassionedly on the side of infertile couples separating natural families and we are on the side of natural families staying together - all extended family members - moms, dads, uncles, aunts, nieces, nephews, cousins, grandparents....  We're on the side of preserving the natural solidarity of family tribes.  We're on the side of ancestral preservation, the stability and preservation of progeny... how many different ways can we say it so you'll understand and stop it!?  Perhaps we're missing something here?  Keeping families together is perfectly logical to us!  What is not perfectly logical or moral or ethical to us is the DOGGED attempt to break these natural, numinous, UNbreakable unions or ties or bonds bestowed on each of us by Nature, by our Creator!  Can't be done!  Can't break the bond - for it is written!  The historical blueprint is written in the deoxyribonucleic acid  [DNA]  of The Universe!!!

B R A I N W A S H     # 1:


    The disgusting propaganda that stood out most throughout the show is the flagrant manner in which Phil McGraw and his adoption attorney-buddies gave it their best shot urging vulnerable single moms to BE SELFLESS - keep the kids a' comin' - for infertile couples to adopt!

    One way they did this is by "brainwash through flattery," such as, selfless, and other adjectives which allude us.  The adjective, selfless, was glaring!  The word, selfless, means unselfish, "having little or no concern or value for oneself," not an attribute at all cherished or respected or revered or propagandized by our society in any other venue but single parenthood.  Odd!?  Good way to make money, though!

    Phil McGraw and his cronies  [the 2 adoption attorneys on the show]  sounded like misogynists.  According to them, single moms must be UNselfish and give away their offspring, as casually as children would give away their toys.  They concurred adamantly that single moms must be selfless and give away their children to others and go on with their lives, which we naturally assume means give away their kids and go to college instead or, perhaps, get a piddling job.

Hmmmmm   ~

    Let us see if we are understanding these generous tips from the self-proclaimed elite? 
Single moms should be selfish about furthering their education but UNselfish  [selfless]  about keeping something as valuable and irreplaceable as THEIR CHILDREN?  WHO would even compare the two!?  What kind of an idiot would equate the life of your child - YOUR life - your ancestry, and your progeny, to a few classes - 4 years of college!!!?  People who make money off of these separations, that's who!  Phil McGraw slinkily makes money off of adoption - he needs variety in his shows to stay  [in business]  on the air, and adoption sells; whereas, Phil McGraw's adoption-attorney buddies outrightly and brazenly make money from family separation!  Adoption is a billion dollar industry!

    Phil McGraw has his defense all prepared, though; he'll say his gig is homes for foster kids.  But we know that infertile couples are picky - they want healthy white infants!

~   [Please don't start that s--t about single moms give their kids for adoption because they love them!  Don't insult our intelligence and that of the viewing audience!]

We would like to ask the adoption attorney, D. Durand Cook, who advertises on Phil McGraw's website:  Did Attorney Cook write that come-hither example on his own website of a letter from a mom to her lost child!?  A mom supposedly wrote a letter to her child lost to adoption in which ...she averred that she gave her child away because she loved him....  [Makes all kinds of sense to us!!!]  Clearly, the reason for this type of advertisement filled with shameless lies on an adoption website is to convince vulnerable single moms to "do the right thing and give up your offspring for adoption" and to assure infertile couples and adoptive parents "it's the right thing to do, go ahead, and adopt the offspring of vulnerable moms."  And, if perchance, a mom did, indeed, write such a silly letter to her lost child, we know, "We, human beings, all think and do what we must to survive trauma, especially we delude and lie to ourselves profusely!  It's perfectly natural to summon our 'defense mechanisms' to come to our aid.  It's a matter of survival!"

~   We're also wondering what is the adoption background of these 3 self-proclaimed adoption experts that comprised the Friday, December 11, 2009, show!?  We're curious because we know that mental health professionals and attorneys haven't been heretofore educated about adoption at all.  There haven't been any classes in college, and the moms of yesteryear who have had children crudely ripped from them for adoption via various, methodical, societal trickery haven't begun speaking out yet; no research has been done.  From whence are these guys getting their expertise?  Do they just make it up as they go along!?  [For further edification about "societal trickery," please see other adoption posts in this blogcast.]

~   We ask Phil McGraw and his adoption cronies and all of you who are gungho about adoption:  Which one of your children would you like to give away?  Just as we thought.  You're all for adoption when you're the taker, but not so much when you're the giver!  What makes you think single parents would enjoy giving their children away to someone else?  What makes you think that single moms would be so selfless when you would not be?  We know why you make one set of rules for yourself and one set of rules for the underdog.  You've been ripping off offspring from unsuspecting, vulnerable, single moms for so long - since YOU made fallen women wear "the scarlet letter."  You've been ripping off offspring for so many decades under the guise of the single mom being a sinful, fallen, woman that it has become second nature to you - natural - you think you have the right!  That's why!  And let's not forget, there's the big bucks in it, too!  Adoption is a billion dollar industry!

    The 3 of these self-proclaimed adoption advocates, Phil McGraw and the more vocal of the 2 adoption attorneys attempted to pull of their flimflam by promulgating what a great and heroic and selfless act the separation of a child from his, or her, mom, dad, and extended family members is.  Adoption adorers keep trying to plant, and replant, the adoption seed - they've now resorted to complimenting, sweet-talking, vulnerable young single females, and their families, everywhere into giving their children, grandchildren, nieces, cousins... away to complete strangers - an utterly irrational, unnatural, act.  An act completely counter to what God, Nature, had obviously intended!

    All pregnant women and new moms are completely and absolutely vulnerable because hormones are raging vehemently, and to take advantage of females in this state, to attempt to take the child of a mother at her most vulnerable time is... quite frankly, there are no adjectives to describe how despicable such an act is!  This leads us to believe that a female still in 2010 will not be safe without the marital protection of a husband because the vultures are out there.  We thought we were out of the Paleolithic Age but we must remember troglodytes still lurk!  In the past, vulnerable young, and older, single pregnant females were merely shamed, disgraced, ostracized,  [brainwashed]  out of their children; whereas today young vulnerable moms are still shamed  [brainwashed]  into giving away their children, but they're also complimented, praised  [brainwashed]  into giving their offspring away.  Shame is not working as well as it did in the completely compliant past.  Although, in some religious families, and circles, for instance, shame still works quite nicely, in point of fact.

    Why are the sex acts and reproductive organs of young females, young moms, the business of so many OTHER people!?  So many other MEN!?  Seems incestuous!?  Like sexual abuse!?

    Phil McGraw and his cronies are spreading  THE LIE  that a mom giving away her flesh-n-blood, a member of her tribe, to strangers is some kinda' selfless act.  In truth, a mom giving away her own flesh-n-blood is the weak act of a vulnerable, brainwashed, human being with severely damaged self-esteem!!!  No mom willingly, selflessly, gives away her own child to strangers never to see again, or even with the promise of minimal contact, unless she has being programmed to do so by various societal means, for example, via the shameful and condescending programming  [brainwashing]  of Phil McGraw and his adoption-attorney buddies from their ivory tower.  You won't see Sarah Palin giving up any of her grandchildren any time soon!  Can't brainwash her!  These guys talk about this transfer of human beings from one person to another so lightly - like giving dolls away!  We don't trade our dogs away with such callousness and ease!  In point of fact, we don't give our dogs away at all!  The whole casualness and easiness with which is scary!!!  Sounded like phraseology that Adolph Hitler espoused!  [Retrospectively, the presentation of the content of last Friday's show in an off sort of way seemed like it was fun for Phil McGraw and his cronies when, in reality, they should have been humbled by the sheer nature of the sacred subject at hand - family.  Phil McGraw wasn't  NEARLY  as pugnacious and stern, strict, as he was in his interview with SINGLE mom, Nadya Suleman.  We conjecture you do get more with the sweetness and casual flow of honey....]

B R A I N W A S H     # 2:

    Equally as disgusting propaganda was Phil McGraw's analogizing of a human being needing to know his, or her, ancestry as mere  CURIOSITY.  What is his exact background in the adoption process and adoption loss?  He can do this to them because adoptees inherently have low self-esteem surrounding being allowed to know their personal and private information which every other American citizen casually and naturally takes for granted like God, Nature, had intended.

    Via telephone, a female adoptee on the program shared of her adoptive dad being upset about her having connected with her ancestry.  She wanted the answer to the simple question, "Who am I?"  Her adoptive dad is upset because she sought out this sacred and solemn information that every other human being just simply takes for granted.  Who is the parent  [adult]  in such pervasive guilt trip cases?  And who is the child?  In adoption, in what-Dr.Phil-haughtily-refers-to-as-a-better-life-for-the-child, why do the adoptees  [the children]  have to take care of the adoptive parents  [the adults]?  Phil McGraw wouldn't advocate for this abusive power struggle in any other familial relationship!?  Why in adoptions, in what-Dr.Phil-lordlily-refers-to-as-a-better-life-for-the-child, do the children have to sacrifice themselves - their emotions and needs - for the adults!?  Shouldn't it, by nature, be the other way around!?

    The Reverend Keith C. Griffith, MBE, is of the opinion that "adoption loss is the only trauma in
the world wherein the victims  {adoptees}  are expected by the whole of society to be grateful."

    Human beings are  CURIOUS  about the "special of the day" on a restaurant menu not essential, natural, imperative answers to solemn and sacred questions like, "What is my nationality?  What is my medical history?  Who are my relatives?  Who do I look like?  Do I resemble ANYone in the Universe?  Is ANYone out there!?  Of what race do I descend?  Who are the people that make up my 1st family?  Do I have brothers and sisters?  I wonder who my father is?  I wonder if my mother would want to see?  I wonder if she ever thinks about me?  What was the name given to me by my 1st mom?  WHO AM I!?"  That's some idle, trivial curiosity!  [Thanks adoption adorers!]

    To make a human being, especially a child that you purport to love, feel guilty for seeking the same solemn information that you possess about yourself is despicable and small!  Cheap!  There are no adjectives to adequately describe such a gut-wrenching scenario!

B R A I N W A S H     # 3:

    Phil McGraw and his adoption-attorney buddies falsely and horrifically advertised that "...through adoption  EVERYBODY WINS  and the single moms who give away their kids to others can then merrily  GO ON WITH THEIR LIVES  knowing they  DID THE RIGHT THING... they should be grateful, in fact...," they have repented for the sin of premarital sex.  The casualness and easiness with which is scary!!!  Sounds like phraseology that Adolph Hitler put forth - the parents of his Hitler Youth group were jailed if they didn't comply and give up their kids....

    Where do Phil McGraw and his cronies get the above imbecilic information about family separation!?  Who's educating these guys!?

Hmmmmm   ~

    This is so unfathomable that we must examine, once again, if we are understanding this SELFISH, twisted, logic correctly. 
Let us tie this brainwash together.  Let us know if we're wrong.  Phil McGraw and his cronies-in- adoption concurred adamantly that the single mom must  (1) be selfless  (2) give away her baby to a deserving married couple  (3) go on with her life, which we naturally assume means go to college or, perhaps, get a piddling job, instead of raising her child  (4) know that she has done the right thing  (5) be grateful that someone took the kid off her unworthy hands.  From this we conclude, in essence, that infertile couples, gays, other singles... feel entitled to other people's children.  It's like in the animal kingdom - the entitled prey on the weak or vulnerable or young.  Infertile people believe that single young moms should just plainly "...give us one and go in your corner and pop out another litter.  You  CAN  have more!  Come on, spread the wealth!  Share those genes!  Be your brother's keeper!  You're nothing but trailer  [park]  trash, anyway!  You don't deserve a child!" 

    To what, of course, we simply and fervidly ask, "Well?  What if the single mom has secondary infertility!?  Our Creator, Nature, has already given to her the gift of one child!"

    You say what, "Tough s--t!?"

    Well that's a fine how-de-do!

    The Reverend Keith C. Griffith, MBE, is of the opinion that "adoption loss is the only trauma in the world wherein the victims  {moms}  are expected by the whole of society to be grateful."

    The audacity!?  [On behalf of all single moms, past, present, and future]  Vehemently,  WE PUSH BACK!  YOU  give  YOUR  kids away and  YOU  win and  YOU  go on with  YOUR  life knowing  YOU  have done the right thing!!!  YOU be YOUR brother's keeper!

    The audacity!?  What're you guys doing in the personal reproductive organs of our single, young women!?

    The view of family life according to Phil McGraw and his adoption cronies just doesn't  FEEL  right!  Ask any thinking individual!  There are no healthy parents, rich or poor, that would give their children away for a better life!  Not on your life!  And Phil McGraw knows that.  WE'RE WAITING FOR PHIL MCGRAW TO THROW GOD INTO THE ADOPTION MIX!  We know that he's thinking it!  He wouldn't dare throw in religion; although, we know that he'd love to tell single moms what society already thinks, "You have sinned, my child.  God wants you to give the product of that sin to deserving infertile married couples who have followed the rules of society, then you'll be forgiven!  Only then can you, harlot, rejoin society!"  Albeit, in essence, isn't that what he and his comrades are saying behind the "be selfless" trick/facade?  That "be selfless" bit sounds so much like religion, doesn't it?  The whole adoption brainwash is CREEPY!

    Hey!  Over there!  Leave your child, the most valuable thing you'll ever have in life.  You go take some classes, instead, dear!'

By the way   ~

    Adoption attorneys and adoption agencies  JUST  recently started so-called "open adoptions,"  ONLY  because business is slow - no kids!  They even shamelessly call it "a marketing tool!"  In addition, many infertile couples prefer adopting children from the, especially, vulnerable overseas market because the ancestry of the adoptee is further away.  Not much chance of intrusion.  This is not a whim!  Prospective adoptive parents have thoroughly thought through their predation; while, on the other hand, vulnerable, innocent, unsuspecting, moms are being the proverbial "selfless" good girls!  [Thanks Phil McGraw!]

WHAT AUDACITY IT MUST TAKE   to sit in the ivory tower of Phil McGraw and his adoption cronies and tell single moms what they should do with their lives and the lives of their children!!!?

U N B E L I E V A B L Y   ~

    Phil McGraw and his cronies promise that  SINGLE MOMS WIN  BY GIVING THEIR CHILDREN TO OTHERS!  A PARENT WINS BY GIVING HER VERY LIFE TO OTHERS!???  This logic we cannot grasp intellectually at all because we know that to parents everywhere, their children  ARE  their lives!!!

So   ~

    Since Phil McGraw and his cronies think it's perfectly legal and moral to advertise for adoptive parents to  "keep doin' it"  [adopting]  and single moms to  keep 'em comin'  [supplying the kids], we think it's appropriate and obligatory of us to say that losing a child to adoption is a horrific and painful and unseemly act!  In point of fact, it's worse!  We cannot think of adequate adjectives to describe the personal holocaust of losing a child, as any parent who has lost a child will attest to.  The insufferable grief never ends!  Nor does it subside with time!  Time does not heal all wounds.  "Time heals all wounds" is another idiotic aphorism of our antiquated, Puritanical, illustrious, patriarchal past!  [Thanks idiotic patriarchs!]  If you don't believe us, feel free to ask any parent who has lost a child!  Don't be bashful.

SINGLE MOMS:     DON'T DIM YOUR OWN LIGHT!  For anybody!  Ever!  [Oprah says so!]

SINGLE MOMS:     THINK LIKE A MAN & ACT LIKE A LADY!  [Steve Harvey says so!  It's even the title of his new book!]

SINGLE MOMS:     DON'T DO IT!!!  SECONDARY INFERTILITY!?
    

Don't give your child for others to adopt!  There's help out there!  [Too bad adoption titans!]  Hospitals and other organizations provide help and classes even to teenaged single moms so they are able to keep their children and raise them wholesomely.  [These organizations make no money out of separating family members.] 

What if you have secondary infertility?  It's very common!  Where are you going to get your kids, then?  From Phil McGraw!?  ALL parents say that their kids, their families, are their life!  Where is your life, then?  You'll have a childless life.  Are you, then, going to adopt?  Settle on just a career when God, Nature, has given you the gift of a child?  Have some self-esteem about yourself, be there for your child!  Just like a mama cub, protect your child from the vultures!  Take the advice of Sarah Palin to her own single daughter, Bristol Palin, "You'll just have to grow up fast!"

And to that, we add, "You have your whole life to be a kid.  A part of all of us remains a kid at heart, if we're lucky.  And that's good!"  
SINGLE MOMS:     LIVE SMARTLY!              
Why do you think infertile couples spend all of their time, energy, and money to adopt kids or obtain kids through other artificial means!?  Why don't  THEY  just go on with their lives like they're conning you into doing if a childless life is so fun!?  Simply because there is nothing in life that can compare in value to your offspring!  A career?  Money?  Possessions?  If you're gambling on being fertile and being able to reproduce again, don't gamble!  If you are fortunate enough to reproduce, again, after you give your child for adoption, what of the empty hole you have left your future children?  They should not have to live as amputees.  Give your future children the gift of taking all of their siblings, their ancestry, for granted.  Don't allow their sibling to dangle out in left field somewhere!   
SINGLE MOMS:     DON'T GIVE YOUR CHILDREN AWAY EVER!

Adoption, the separation of family members, is a bloodcurdling institution indefensibly up there with mom, baseball, and apple pie.  Adoption must only be employed when children are true orphans and when no other relatives are in sight!  It is never ethical or moral to separate a family to create a family!

SINGLE MOMS:     KEEP UP THE GOOD FIGHT!
  

A "gentleman's agreement" is not enforceable by law!  It is only binding as a matter of personal honor!  Beware - the adoptive parent is not always honorable!  

An "open adoption" is done via a "gentleman's agreement."  According to such an agreement, dishonorable, unscrupulous, adoptive parents are allowed to move out of town anytime they like and are not obligated to tell the 1st mom of the child where they have moved.  What good is it, then!?

SEEK LEGAL ACTION  if you find yourself in a so-called "open adoption" which the adoptive parents have reneged on!  Typically, open adoption is done by what is known as "a gentleman's agreement" but, beware, the adoptive parent is not always a gentleman or a lady!  They have expertise in being selfish.  They've fought long and hard to acquire your child.  You must learn to be selfish, also, not as giving as you have been heretofore.  Toughen up, girl!  Don't be so kind!

If you absolutely must physically separate yourself from your child, do not give your child to others without A BINDING CONTRACT!  S---w the "gentleman's agreement!"


Carla, who was admirably on the December 11, 2009, show, is the only natural mom we've ever heard of that is fighting, or has fought, adoptive parents who have callously and cowardly (cheap as s--t) reneged on their promise of an open adoption.  The rest just wait like the heartwrenching, demeaning, spirit-robbing adoption experience has groomed them - to be silent, passive, amputees.

Shame on you selfish and moneygrubbing people!!!

{ We would like to take this opportunity to thank Dr. Phil and his staff for airing such a program, thus allowing for this chance debate and hopeful edification of the public anent the trauma of family separation.  We feel somewhat uncomfortable about the harshness of this evaluation, critique, as it pertains to our beloved Dr. Phil, but you, as a society, have not listened!  We understand that you are uneducated about adoption loss.  Or, perhaps, you know all about it and just don't care, which quite frankly we think is the case.  YOU  [plural]  just don't care!  You have left us no choice!  We feel bad that we have had to stoop.... }

Exchanging Spit in the Days of H1N1 on "The View"

The Incompetency Is Herculean! (And Ubiquitous!)

With the threat of the virulent H1N1 flu, and other formidable and contagious diseases, such as, herpes... spreading like wildfire, we witnessed the following grotesque and shocking anomaly on television.  Over 22 million Americans have been sick from the H1N1 flu since April of 2009.

On November 13, 2009, The View was celebrating Whoopi Goldberg's 54th birthday.  Reality TV personality, Duff Goldman of Ace of Cakes, wheeled out the humungous birthday cake and proceeded to slice and dispense pieces of it to the gleeful onlookers like Whoopi, Joy Behar, Sherri Shepherd....  I believe Stephen King also participated.  What occurred in-between the slice and the handout was the repulsive drawback.  Mr. Goldman licked his fingers vigorously or rigorously (With my far-reaching vocabulary, I have a tough time choosing my words; I want to give them all a chance.).  Mr. Goldman didn't only do it two, or three, times; he did it many times.  He really got in there and reveled in his saliva.  And not just one lick after each handout, but several licks after each cut of the cake, 'round and 'round, entire fingers of both hands sliding, slithering, one at a time, into his mouth and gliding out again, and again, and noone said a word, not even humor or friendly sarcasm from the Goldberg camp.  He was up to his elbows in spit!  My mouth was agape!  Intermittently, I was exclaiming (or do you like the word, "vociferating"?) into the television or to whosoever was within earshot, "HE BETTER NOT DO IT AGAIN?" and he did.  I almost puked!  In fact, I grimace as I write this post!

Undoubtedly, the cake was passed around to SOMEONE after the show; it was huge.  We all know how talk-show hosts like to pass around items to the audience.  As I pictured the girls, and guests, producers, of The View generously offering pieces of the above tainted cake to them, my mind bolted back to the episode of Seinfeld during which the toothbrush of Jerry's girlfriend accidentally fell into the toilet.  Before he was able to inform her that the toothbrush had fallen into the toilet, she was already brushing her teeth with it.  (Gulp!)  Afterward, she attempted several times to kiss Jerry Seinfeld and was baffled by his constant tightlipped grimacing, squirming, and squinching... shaking his head, "No," each time she tried to kiss him.  The staccato manner in which he shook his head and torso was the comedy.

I envision members of the audience emulating Seinfeld, shaking their heads, "Thanks, but no thanks," as employees of The View munificently attempt to foist slices of the tainted cake onto them.

Makes me wonder what Mr. Goldman does behind closed doors?  I cannot recall the last time I saw anyone lick his, or her, fingers, much less a television personality.  (Good thing most little kids were in school; albeit, many, many impressionable tykes were watching with Mommy.)  Whoopi's birthday celebration was not a comedy.  The whole stomach-churning scenario doesn't bode well for the titans of The View!  What if we were all that careless!?  (Dare I say "uncouth"?)  Surely the number of H1N1 flu cases, for instance, would rise catastrophically!  (I have plenty of adverbs vying to be at the head of the previous sentence.  Drat!)

I am continually amazed that anything EVER gets done appropriately anywhere, including, in government, business, academia, hospitals, eateries....  I'm realizing what a real and rare feat it truly is - when something gets done without a hitch.  With the preponderance of inadequacy and incompetency, I marvel that our society actually functions as well as it does.  It's uncanny!  (Or, do you like, "It's mysterious!"?)  I conjecture it is the price we pay for being human (sloppy).  Personally, though, I wasn't raised that way (to be human)!

To combat ubiquitous incompetency, my humble opinion is:  LIVE SMARTLY!  Be your own advocate!  Follow your own intuition!



 

Pernicious Prejudice is Alive and Prospering in 2009!

We meander through various venues researching ways in which people are oppressed.  On September 3, 2009, we attended an adoption support group meeting where, in our thirst for knowledge, we inquired as to the thoughts of adoptees when, in their youth, they first realized what being adopted means.  What were their reactions, their thought processes, at this most pivotal time?

An ADULT female adoptee divulged, sophomorically, "... I was told that I'm lucky; I was chosen.  My mom loved me so much that she gave me away...."

WHAT A BLATANT, IDIOTIC, LIE adoptees are told by their adoptive parents!  AN INEXCUSABLE, UNFORGIVABLE, SICK, INSULT!  A LURID SLAP!  What a catty insult to, and disregard for, the millions of vulnerable families that have needlessly lost children, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins... via adoption.  The ONLY reason that millions of families, tribes, have lost members/loved ones to adoption is because of the disgrace that their "friends" and acquaintances (society) imposed on the families of single pregnant females - and, of course, because of money and greed (adoption industry), and envy (infertile married couples - "We followed the rules and got married and can't procreate and the single slut who doesn't follow the rules is able to procreate - the unmarried wanton female gets the gifts - it's not fair)!"

At the meeting, the perspective of a mom who has lost her child to adoption was, "Infertile couples will have to find another hobby.  Single moms aren't going to supply them with kids much longer!"

Economics 101:  Whenever there is a demand, a supply will surely be wangled!

Adoption is a billion dollar industry!  The titans, that includes adoptive parents and prospective adoptive parents (the demand), finagled a way to extract children (the product) from vulnerable families (the supply) and the way that they finagled this feat was, and is, through societal trickery (mores), such as, shame, stigma, disgrace, religion, the threat of ostracism....  The complete family of a single female who had the audacity to give birth to a child was shunned, ostracized, disgraced, stigmatized... hence, pressured into getting rid of the evidence (the product or commodity or child) of brazenly having engaged in the sex act.  Only after giving the "illegitimate" bastard (We didn't say it, your neighbors, your society, said it!) to others is the family accepted back into society, however minimally.  But, this acceptance is only an illusion; they would still be considered forever "trailer [park] trash."  (Don't get mad at us.  We didn't say it, your society says it.)  It wasn't so much that anyone cared really about a single female engaging in the sex act so much; it was the audacity of a child, a reward, a gift, being bestowed on the single mom by the Creator of all of us that was so objectionable and that produced cyclopean envy... when there were so many infertile married couples who followed the rules....  (Well - we take that back - your illustrious society WAS consumed with the sex habits of their neighbors; people habitually counted backwards 9 months from the birth of a married couple's 1st child to deduce whether the couple had engaged in sex before marriage.)

Of course, far too many people still have their hands, and expectations, out - too many people still shamefully and perfervidly attempt to separate vulnerable families - it's easy to pounce on the vulnerable - but the image of Robert Dole, attorney, U.S. Senator, and 1996 Republican presidential nominee, in a television ad encouraging society dismally remains embedded in our minds, he urged, "Come on, gang!  [Wink.  Wink.]  Let's all unite!  Let's get the stigma back into single motherhood!  Let's ostracize the single mom!" 

As recently as August 19, 2009, Bernie Goldberg, 10-time award winning American writer, journalist, and political commentator, told Fox News' Bill O'Reilly that single mom, Nadya Suleman and her 14 children are crap.  They were, perhaps, discussing an upcoming television special about Nadya.

Is this the intelligent, respectful, dignified loquacity of a reputable commentator on primetime television for children to hear or overhear  (overhear banter at the dinner table which they could then take to the playground)!?  What kind of a human being, a professional, would call a mom, and 14 innocent children (gifts from God) - crap!?  Had Nadya Suleman been married, we believe that Mr. Goldberg wouldn't have dared eject his vitriolic prejudice!

Pairs that have had multiple births have been in the news and we haven't observed any venom spewed toward these married couples.

Makes Me Wonder What Else They're Not Telling Me?

(((  Shouldn't the Titans Be a Little More With It!?  Educated!?  Research-Savvy!?  Honest!?  )))


The 1st Hispanic Supreme Court Justice is NOT Sonia Sotomayor!


by Norman Cohen, Los Angeles

The media are crowing about President Obama selecting the "1st Hispanic Supreme Court Justice," Sonia Sotomayor.  I have news for the media.

We already have had a Hispanic U.S. Supreme Court Justice!  He was Benjamin Nathan Cardozo, U.S. Supreme Court Justice from 1932 - 1938, a Sephardic Jew of Spanish ancestry. 

His father, Judge Albert Cardozo, was Vice President and Trustee of the famous Spanish-Portuguese synagogue in New York City, Congregation Shearith Israel.  Young Benjamin was Bar Mitzvah in that synagogue, and as an adult was proud of both his Jewish and Hispanic heritage.

Congregation Shearith Israel is the oldest congregation in the Western Hemisphere, having been founded in Recife, Brazil ca. 1630 and moved to New Amsterdam (now New York City) in 1654.  Its present location is at 70th Street and Central Park West.  I spent some of my religious and social activity time there as a teenager in the 1950s, when the Rav (the Hebrew word for Rabbi) was the famous Dr. David de Sola Pool.

One thing that surprised me there: the names on the memorial plaques... they were just like my Puerto Rican friends and not at all like my Jewish friends.  Study of this history and culture has become a hobby of mine.

Most American Jews, who are of Ashkenaz origins, neither know of nor understand this important component of the Jewish people:

~ Jews were a major component of the populations of Spain and Portugal for 800 years (700 - 1500 CE).

~ Ladino, the "sephardic Yiddish" based on pre-1500 Spanish, is still spoken by 200,000 Jewish descendants around the world, mainly in Mediterranean regions. 

~ 45 of the 50 most common Hispanic family names are of Jewish origin.

~ All Hispanic given names ending in "el" are Hebrew phrases with reference to G-d, like Gabriel, Emanuel, Rafael, etc.

~ Many Spanish words and names of places are of Hebrew origin.

~ If you represented all Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust by a crowded Dodger Stadium, just those Jews whose family names were Gamboa and Graciano would fill a whole section of box seats.

~ Gamboas and Gracianos are in Jewish cemeteries all over the world... even in Poland, Canada, South Africa, and Israel.

~ That's just 2 Sephardic-Jewish names.

~ A recent analysis of the DNA of 20 statistical samples of men of Spain found that 20% have the Jewish genetic haplogroup, viz. they descend from Jews.

~ The only way that this is possible: there was already massive assimilation of the Jews of Spain in the centuries leading up to the Inquisition.

~ There are organized groups of b'nai anusim - descendants of Jewish victims of Inquisitions in Spain, Portugal, and Latin America who were forced to convert, or who hid and abandoned their Jewishness out of fear of persecution - who are clamoring for acceptance as Jewish returnees.

~ It is estimated that a significant fraction of the Hispanics of the Southwestern USA and Northern Mexico are of Jewish ancestry and don't know it.

But the media would not think of, nor recognize, Benjamin Cardozo as a "Hispanic."  They want a "genuine" Hispanic, certainly not one who was/is also a Jew and was considered a "Great Justice."


Blog Software
Blog Software