Aahhh! Will the Imbecility Never Cease!?
Welcome, Fellow Intellectuals in the United States & Around the World !
Remember, Words Have Tremendous Power!
On January 14, 2011, Dr. Phil McGraw promulgated once again that, "THERE IS NO GREATER LOVE THAN A MOTHER GIVING HER CHILD AWAY!" It seems like he says it repeatedly every time we turn on his program. When is this emotional incest going to stop?
Lone Phil McGraw is still attempting to convince us, in the 21st century, that there is no greater love than a single mother { & her family-tribe } putting her child up for adoption by strangers, separating her child from her child's COMPLETE family and COMPLETE ancestry, changing her child's name and giving her child a false identity, in essence, making her child a psychological, emotional, and mental amputee.
REMEMBER:
LIFE IS VERY SHORT!
LIFE IS VERY SHORT!
Also, this is very insulting to the family-tribe insinuating that the family-tribe is too stupid to incorporate a new family member into its own fold! Who the hell does Dr. Phil think he is!? He talks to his viewing audience like you're fools!
Of course, you can bet Dr. Phil would never have given up one of his children! Had Dr. Phil been a poor single teen-aged father, he would have slept in his car with his children before he would have ever given one of them up for adoption! Go ahead! Ask him!
Remember, many, if not most, of our over-achieving movers-n-shakers were raised by single teen-aged moms, i.e., LeBron James and Oprah and many, many more. Why is Dr. Phil so fixated on the private sexual escapades of our young women?
Here is what adoption is: Adoption is a permanent solution to a temporary "problem" - that is, if you view a child as a problem. We, of course, view every child as a gift from God to its rightful family! Our God doesn't make mistakes!
We, at Watching The Watchers, are naturally fixated on adoption because the rich and the powerful are fixated on adoption - they want to tell you what to do with your sex life. Business must be slow; there's only Lybia in the news and boring governmental shut-down issues and the British Royal Wedding is somewhat in the distance.
Yeah, we're watchin' you! We could use the same argument right back at adoption-adorers, like Dr. Phil and Elisabeth Hasselbeck and Justin Bieber: SINGLE MOMS HAPPEN FOR A REASON! { and it's not to furnish YOU with children } Remember what ya' said: EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR A REASON!
* * *
At last year's internationally-renowned and prestigious adoption conference in New York City,
Professor Rene Hoksbergen, PhD., of the Netherlands facilitated a panel
discussion about how, and why, DOMESTIC ADOPTION WAS STOPPED - BANNED - IN THE NETHERLANDS! Who are you going to believe? Dr. Phil? A talk-show host who hasn't kept up with his studies, one who is so rich that he has allowed his psychological license to lapse - one looking for television ratings?
Each year, mental health professionals, like Dr. Phil, are supposed to earn Continuing Education Units ( CEUs ) so they can remain updated on new and improved ways of doing business; research is continually being done and new and better, more humane, ways of treating people in search of psychological help are constantly being uncovered.
Or, are you going to believe a preeminent international expert on adoption and his whole Dutch society of people? Who would you say knows best? The lone wolf who's stuck back in the oppressive mid-20th century who loves to separate families? Or, do you believe roughly 17,000,000 Dutch people? Who would you believe? Dr. Phil or Dr. Hoksbergen?
It irks us that Dr. Phil always says he's only looking out for "the child." He's always hiding behind "the child." Well, why doesn't he mind his own business and leave families { tribes } alone to find their own way? Dr. Phil is still stuck back in the 20th century when, for example:
- The husband still had the right to rape his wife. There was no law against raping your wife. Did that mean that he could slap her around real good until she caved? You bet! It was her duty, damn it, to give her man sexual pleasure! Yes!
- In addition, there was no such animal as date-rape, either. There was no law against your date raping you after dinner.
- In addition to that, parents were supposed to beat their children into submission - "Spare the rod and spoil the child," was another sickness of the day.
- Psychiatrists and psychologists... believed - and taught in their prestigious Diagnostic Manuals - that homosexuality is a deviant mental illness.
- The mentally-ill and mentally-handicapped were cruelly, inhumanely, locked up { worse than animals } in institutions for Life.
- Words, such as, "pregnant" "abortion" and "toilet" were not allowed to be said on United States television.
- Couples { actors } who were married in real-life were not allowed to be shown in sitcombs on United States television sleeping or laying in the same bed; they could only be shown in separate beds; and, we believe, they could only touch by way of holding a handkerchief.
- Women weren't allowed to get credit cards - only if a husband would sign off on it, would a woman be given a credit card. Yep, the female needed a husband's permission!
- { We keep telling you that our secular patriarchs were "sick cookies"! And, to this day, we have to suffer from the repercussions of their sickness! How long are you gonna' allow yourself to be treated like an inferior second-class citizen by your cheap, inadequate, arrogant, "neighbors" ? HOW LONG!? }
Please remember, readers, that it was the patriarchs { the men } who conveniently made the laws in the recent past, yeah, men - Dr. Phil is a man!
Don't act like you're helping, Dr. Phil! { by taking our children! ok? } Don't help us so much and we won't write about you anymore.
Don't act like you're helping, Dr. Phil! { by taking our children! ok? } Don't help us so much and we won't write about you anymore.
Hi, I must say that you have made some good points in the post. I performed searches on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog. Thanks for sharing this information.
Reply to this
This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing websites that understand the value of providing a quality information. Thanks for sharing.
Reply to this
I would like to forward you some stuff I wrote for First Mother members about adoption in the Netherlands, but I do not have your e-mail...
Reply to this
The adoption stats for the Netherlands in 2010:
Total adoptions: 672,
Chinese born: 317, 210 boys !!!
Haiti born: 58
Dutch born: 36
USA born: 33
Three dozen domestic adoptions in a country of about 16.7 million inhabitants, shows that the practice still continues, to some degree.
2010 shows a significant reduction of adoption of children before first birthday, relinquished Dutch borns cannot be adopted under 15 months and SN kids are usually kept in foster care too.The adoption numbers have dropped nicely back to the mid 90's levels since annus horribilis 2004 (1378 children adopted into Dutch families)
China Haiti NL USA Total
0yr 6 0 1 30 78
1yr 120 1 12 1
2yr 108 13 9 1
3yr 56 17 5 0
4yr 20 14 1 0
5yr 2 7 1 0
old 5 6 7 1
Mind you, step parent adoptions and 50 Haitan children who immigrated for adoption in 2010, but weren't fully adopted yet on the were excluded from these data, most orphans are raised by blood relatives,which does not have to involve adoption, though not all adoption by kin is illegal, some orphans, don't have any family left, so the numbers cannot be taken as the relinquishment numbers... That Dutch 0 year baby is way too young for a normal baby relinquishment, and you would expect a bit of adopting against break up of foster families by aging out.
The USA seems to be the leading neonate producer for the Dutch market.
Reply to this
The person who create this post it was a great human..thanks for shared this with us.i found this informative and interesting blog so i think so its very useful and knowledge able.I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article.
Reply to this